Skip to content
Nami Keystone Pennsylvania at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Nami Keystone Pennsylvania

Nami (national alliance on mental illness) keystone pa's mission is to improve the lives of individuals and families affected by mental illness through recovery focused support, education, and advocacy.

$978k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$854k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $687,380, the rows itemized in this filing. The $977,784 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $290,404 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $607k
$57,971
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMI DAUPHIN$103,075
NAMI BUCKS$93,344
NAMI CUMBERLANDPERRY$82,592
NAMI YORKADAMS$80,360
NAMI BUTLER$76,514
NAMI BERKS$57,971
NAMI ERIE$57,275
NAMI MAINLINE$55,441
NAMI LEHIGH VALLEY$35,875
NAMI BLAIR$28,131
NAMI MONTGOMERY$9,169
NAMI NORTHEASTERN$7,633
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NAMI BUCKS: $93k → 6%NAMI MONTGOMERY: $17k → 7%NAMI CUMBERLANDPERRY: $83k → 8%NAMI BUTLER: $77k → 9%NAMI YORKADAMS: $80k → 9%NAMI BERKS: $58k → 11%NAMI LEHIGH VALLEY: $36k → 11%NAMI DAUPHIN: $103k → 12%NAMI NORTHEASTERN: $8k → 13%NAMI BLAIR: $28k → 13%NAMI ERIE: $57k → 15%NAMI BUCKS: $14k → 6%NAMI MONTGOMERY: $9k → 7%NAMI CUMBERLANDPERRY: $19k → 8%NAMI BUTLER: $14k → 9%NAMI BERKS: $22k → 11%NAMI LEHIGH VALLEY: $22k → 11%NAMI DAUPHIN: $15k → 12%NAMI NORTHEASTERN: $7k → 13%NAMI BLAIR: $6k → 13%NAMI ERIE: $31k → 15%NAMI MAINLINE: $55k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$718k · 10 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$718k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+175%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NAMI CENTRAL PA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $118k · revenue +162% · 48% of their budget
  • NB
    NAMI BUCKS COUNTY PA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $107k · revenue +263%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF BUTLER COUNTY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $91k · revenue +15% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS YORK COUNTY
    one grant, 2025 · $80k · revenue 0%
  • NM
    NAMI MAIN LINE PAgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $55k · revenue +175%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami Mahoning Valley

to provide support for residents with mental illness

Health
2
Nami Montgomery County Ohio

The national alliance on mental illness (nami) is the nation's largest grassroots mental health organization, established in 1979 for mental health clients and their families as a self-help organization dedicated to providing support,…

—
3
Nami Pa Butler County

Nami provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

—
4
Nami White Mountains Az

We represent a community of people who are committed to relieving the pain and suffering of families and peers whose lives are impacted by a Mental Health Condition. The NAMI approach has been proven to work across the United States! NAMI…

Health
5
Nami - Genesee County

Nami is dedicated to the eradication of mental illnesses and to the improvement of the quality of life of all who are affected by these diseases.

—
6
Nami National Alliance for the Mentally Ill Plymouth Area

Educate/Support families affected by mental illness

Health
7
Nami Northwest

Nami is a tri-county voice for mental illness. it builds a community of hope for those with mental illness and their families, thru support, education and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
8
Nami Boulder County

NAMI provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
9
Nami Joplin

NAMI Joplin is a mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for the millions of Americans affected by mental illness by raising awareness and providing support and education that was not previously available to those in…

—
10
Nami Mid-Hudson Inc

NAMI Mid-Hudson is a mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for Ulster and Dutchess County residents living in New York and provides Mental Health Education,Support and Advocacy

—
11
Nami South Mountains Nc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with mental illness and their families through support, education, and advocacy.

Health
12
Nami Rome Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with mental illness and their families through support, education, and advocacy

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami of Pa Montgomery County; the most unlike its peers is National Alliance On Mental Illness of Butler County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAMI BUCKS COUNTY PA: $107,034 · HealthNAMI BUCKS COUNTY PANAMI Cumberland and Perry Counties PA: $101,928 · HealthNAMI Cumberland and Perry Counties PANAMI OF ERIE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA: $88,114 · HealthNAMI OF ERIE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIANATIONAL ALLIANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS YORK COUNTY: $80,360 · HealthNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS YORK COUNTYNAMI BERKS COUNTY PA: $80,036 · HealthNAMI BERKS COUNTY PANAMI MAIN LINE PA: $55,441 · HealthNAMI MAIN LINE PANAMI Pennsylvania Blair County Chapter: $33,825 · HealthNAMI Pennsylvania Blair County ChapterNAMI OF PA MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $25,871 · HealthNAMI CENTRAL PA: $117,726 · OtherNAMI CENTRAL PANATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF BUTLER COUNTY: $90,948 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL I…NAMI PA SCRANTON AREA CHAPTER: $14,155 · OtherNAMI PA SCRANTON AREA CHAPTERNAMI LEHIGH VALLEY: $58,325 · Recreation & Sports
Health$572,609Other$222,829Recreation & Sports$58,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAMI CENTRAL PA: $117,726 over 2y, 48% of budgetNAMI Cumberland and Perry Counties PA: $101,928 over 2y, 76% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF BUTLER COUNTY: $90,948 over 2y, 42% of budgetNAMI OF ERIE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA: $88,114 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS YORK COUNTY: $80,360 over 1y, 22% of budgetNAMI LEHIGH VALLEY: $58,325 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetNAMI Pennsylvania Blair County Chapter: $33,825 over 2y, 17% of budgetNAMI OF PA MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $25,871 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNAMI PA SCRANTON AREA CHAPTER: $14,155 over 2y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NAMI NationalAmazonsmile Foundation
NAMI NationalVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NAMI National · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nami Keystone Pennsylvania funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nami Keystone Pennsylvania. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nami Keystone Pennsylvania?

    Find your warmest path to Nami Keystone Pennsylvania through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nami Keystone Pennsylvania’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home