Skip to content
Naktenis Km & Pe Fam Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Naktenis Km & Pe Fam Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$112kHealth$39kAnimals$32kRecreation & Sports$30kScience & Tech$28kArts & Culture$27kReligion$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYSTIC AQUARIUM$22,500
ICCI-INT'L CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE$20,000
CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY$10,000
MOHONK PRESERVE$6,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE$5,000
PROTECT OUR WINTERS$5,000
ACCESS SURF HAWAII$5,000
YOSEMITE INSTITUTE$5,000
FRIENDS OF CO AVALANCHE INFORMATION CTR$5,000
RAGGED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC$5,000
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION$5,000
ACCESS FUND$5,000
STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION$5,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 8%GNOME SURF: $5k → 11%KOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%YOSEMITE INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%DANNY DRESCHER SCHOLARSHIP - UC AT SF: $3k → 19%JAMESVILLE COMMUNITY MUSEUM: $5k → 14%MOHONK PRESERVE: $6k → 16%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $5k → 10%IRONMAN FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%MYSTIC AQUARIUM: $23k → 9%CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 7%THE PUBLIC'S RADIO: $3k → 14%FRIENDS OF CO AVALANCHE INFORMATION CTR: $5k → 7%ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $5k → 11%PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $5k → 12%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%INT'L CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE: $29k → 10%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 8%KOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%YOSEMITE INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%JAMESVILLE COMMUNITY MUSEUM: $5k → 14%MOHONK PRESERVE: $5k → 16%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MYSTIC AQUARIUM: $16k → 9%CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF CO AVALANCHE INFORMATION CTR: $5k → 7%BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER: $5k → 9%PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $5k → 12%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%INTERNATIONAL CRYOSPHERE: $20k → 10%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 8%YOSEMITE INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%MOHONK PRESERVE: $5k → 16%MYSTIC AQUARIUM: $11k → 9%HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY: $10k → 11%FRIENDS OF CO AVALANCHE INFORMATION CTR: $5k → 7%BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER: $5k → 9%PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $5k → 12%STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%ICCI-INT'L CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE: $20k → 10%HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY: $10k → 11%BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER: $5k → 9%RAGGED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR HEALING THERAPIES: $7k → 9%RAGGED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR HEALING THERAPIES: $4k → 9%RAGGED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 28 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
15

Total granted

$377k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

57%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentScience & TechHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +1%
  • AH
    ACCESSURF HAWAII INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +63%
  • MP
    MOHONK PRESERVE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $29k · revenue 0%
  • IA
    ICCI - ATTN PAM PEARSON
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
2
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Adventurers and Scientists for Conservation

we ensure the availability of critical field data that accelerates conservation and climate solutions. we achieve our mission by mobilizing and training outdoor enthusiasts and local communities to collect high-quality scientific data that…

Environment
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

—
7
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
8
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
9
Schmidt Ocean Institute
Science & Tech
10
Glacier National Park Conservancy

The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.

Recreation & Sports
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; the most unlike its peers is Healing Therapies Thru Sharing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYSTIC AQUARIUM: $49,400 · OtherMYSTIC AQUARIUMICCI - ATTN PAM PEARSON: $20,000 · OtherICCI - ATTN PAM PEARSONICCI-INT'L CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE: $20,000 · OtherICCI-INT'L CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY FAMILY MONASTERY: $20,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY MONASTERYYOSEMITE INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherYOSEMITE INSTITUTECHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherRAGGED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE ACCESS FUND: $15,000 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CO AVALANCHE INFORMATION CTR: $15,000 · OtherJAMESVILLE COMMUNITY MUSEUM: $12,500 · Other+23 more: $109,200 · Other+23 moreTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $28,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER F…MOHONK PRESERVE INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentMOHONK PRESERVE…PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $15,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WIN…KOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentKOKUA HAWAII FO…SALT PONDS COALITION INC: $4,500 · EnvironmentSALT PONDS COAL…INTERNATIONAL CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE: $28,500 · Science & TechINTERNATION…WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $15,000 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE …ATLANTIC SHARK INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Science & TechATLANTIC SH…ACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,000 · HealthLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthHealing Therapies Thru Sharing Inc: $1,000 · Health
Other$347,100Environment$73,500Science & Tech$53,500Human Services$20,000Recreation & Sports$20,000International$10,000Health$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE: $28,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACCESS FUND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC SHARK INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetKOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALT PONDS COALITION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSpiritual Life Center Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRYOSPHERE CLIMATE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSURF HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds MOHONK PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC SHARK INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds KOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SALT PONDS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Spiritual Life Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naktenis Km & Pe Fam Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naktenis Km & Pe Fam Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 63%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Naktenis Km & Pe Fam Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home