· Private foundation
Na Hoaloha O Ka'Aina Ltd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AINA MOMONA | $9,446 |
| HUA MOMONA FOUNDATION | $9,392 |
| LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION | $9,088 |
| COUNCIL OF NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEM | $9,070 |
| LELE ALOHA | $8,390 |
| HAWAII VA FOUNDATION | $5,312 |
| LAHAINA JODO MISSION | $5,233 |
| FESTIVAL OF ALOHA INC | $5,000 |
| IMUA FAMILY SERVICES | $3,000 |
| LAHAINA HONOLUA SENIOR CITIZEN CLUB | $1,500 |
| NA LEO KAKO'O O MAUI INC | $1,500 |
| LOKAHI ATHLETICS | $1,000 |
| MAUI POPS ORCHESTRA INC | $650 |
| HAWAII ALL-STARTS RAINBOW | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MAUI INC2× · 2018–2019 · $31k · revenue +454%
- HIHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST2× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +9%
- LHLAHAINALUNA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +147%
- LALAHAINA ARTS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -45%
- MHMAUI HUI MALAMAone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.
The purpose is to preserve and restore the indigenous hawiian culture, farming traditions, fishing practices and hula.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kauahea Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hua Momona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MAUI INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds LAHAINALUNA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LELE ALOHA ↗
- Who funds MERWIN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AINA MOMONA ↗
- Who funds Friends of Childrens Justice Center ↗
- Who funds Maui Pops Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOKAHI PACIFIC ↗
- Who funds IMUA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INC ↗
- Who funds LAHAINA ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUI MALAMA ↗
- Who funds MAUI CULTURAL LANDS INC ↗
- Who funds EAST MAUI ANIMAL REFUGE ↗
- Who funds THE MAUI FARM INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUA MOMONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds HAWAII VA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HALAU HULA KAULUOKALA ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PET NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Halau Kekuaokalaaualailiahi Inc ↗
- Who funds Halau O Ka Hanu Lehua Inc ↗
- Who funds NA MAMO ALOHA AINA O HONOKOHAU ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEARNING INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds KAUAHEA INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN HAWAII ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fred Baldwin Memorial Foundation · Maui United Way · Aina Momona · Atherton Family Foundation · The O L Moore Foundation · Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement · Garmar Foundation · Jeanne and Jim Riley Foundation · The Makana Aloha Foundation · Bendon Family Foundation · The Red Cabin Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Na Hoaloha O Ka'Aina Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.