Skip to content
N & S Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

N & S Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$515k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.7MReligion$757kInternational$385kEducation$147kHuman Services$92kHealth$49kFood & Nutrition$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$26k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $201k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $261k
$14,225
Median grant
4
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Friends of Kupat Hair$109,778
Ezras Yisroel$90,500
Small Donations to Various 501c3 cl$60,769
Adirei Torah$33,840
Individual grant recipient$27,145
Individual grant recipient$23,098
Individual grant recipient$23,000
Lakewood Cheder School$21,820
Individual grant recipient$19,350
Torah Vchesed$14,417
Individual grant recipient$14,225
Individual grant recipient$12,533
Keren Ha'ir Zichron Yisroel$12,000
Individual grant recipient$8,950
Cheder Toras Zev$7,085
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $5k → 11%Yad Chaya: $37k → 11%Bonei Olam: $26k → 20%Bonei Olam: $22k → 20%Netzach Foundation Inc: $18k → 11%Netzach Foundation Inc: $14k → 11%Yad Chaya: $12k → 11%Aim Habonim: $11k → 11%Yad Chaya: $10k → 11%Netzach Foundation Inc: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 31 repeat orgs$434k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
26

Total granted

$2.7M
$334k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+12%

Still filing today

42%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR
    5× · 2020–2024 · $332k · revenue +13%
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $119k · revenue +26%
  • YC
    YAD CHAYA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $59k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BC
    Bayit Cham
    one grant, 2022 · $76k
  • TW
    THE WOMANS NETWORK FOR SINGLE PARENTS
    one grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue +12%
  • HA
    Hatzolah Air Emergency Response Tea
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
5
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
8
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
9
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
10
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
12
Derech Hachaim Fund Inc

To engage in furthering of jewish education and to provide support to torah scholars who are struggling financially.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Dmir Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Small Donations to Various 501c3 cl: $772,655 · OtherSmall Donations to Various 501c3 clCong Yeshiva Bais Hillel: $370,000 · OtherCong Yeshiva Bais HillelIndividual grant recipient: $129,490 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEzras Yisroel: $119,500 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICA: $101,340 · Other+36 more: $850,451 · Other+36 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $331,755 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIEN…KUPAS YOM TOV INC: $18,400 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $17,442 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $16,100 · Religion+2 more: $20,000 · ReligionYAD CHAYA INC: $59,320 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $48,512 · Human ServicesTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · Human ServicesAim Habonim Inc: $11,208 · Human Services+1 more: $5,250 · Human ServicesLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $118,739 · EducationCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $17,285 · EducationBAIS YAAKOV OF JACKSON INC: $10,000 · EducationHOPE ORGANIZATION: $5,851 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationDONORS FUND INC: $40,653 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DVAR SHALOM: $16,500 · PhilanthropyVEROMAMTANU INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyKUPAS CHAIM LEVI INC: $8,250 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $31,000 · InternationalTORAH COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10,000 · InternationalTHE WOMANS NETWORK FOR SINGLE PARENTS: $33,015 · Civil Rights
Other$2,343,436Religion$403,697Human Services$161,790Education$156,875Philanthropy$77,403International$41,000Civil Rights$33,015

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $331,755 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $118,739 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $59,320 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $48,512 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $40,653 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WOMANS NETWORK FOR SINGLE PARENTS: $33,015 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $30,060 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKUPAS YOM TOV INC: $18,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $17,442 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $17,285 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DVAR SHALOM: $16,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $16,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAim Habonim Inc: $11,208 over 1y, 24% of budgetTORAH COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRav Chaims Kollelim Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF JACKSON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKUPAS CHAIM LEVI INC: $8,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOPE ORGANIZATION: $5,851 over 1y, 54% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA YESHIVA OF CHESTNUT RIDGE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMANS NETWORK FOR SINGLE PARENTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds KUPAS YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DVAR SHALOM ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds VEROMAMTANU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Zichron Btz Tzedakah …Donors Fund IncAssociated Jewish Cha…Jewish Community Foun…The Jmg FoundationJsp Family FoundationLakewood Cheder Schoo…Jacob and Malka Fisch…Zichron Yechiel Meche…
The Ojc FundNY35.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Jmg Foundation · Jsp Family Foundation · Lakewood Cheder School Inc · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization N & S Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from N & S Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 22% of income from government
  • Bais Yaakov of Jackson Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on N & S’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home