· Private foundation
N & S Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $201k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $261k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| American Friends of Kupat Hair | $109,778 |
| Ezras Yisroel | $90,500 |
| Small Donations to Various 501c3 cl | $60,769 |
| Adirei Torah | $33,840 |
| Individual grant recipient | $27,145 |
| Individual grant recipient | $23,098 |
| Individual grant recipient | $23,000 |
| Lakewood Cheder School | $21,820 |
| Individual grant recipient | $19,350 |
| Torah Vchesed | $14,417 |
| Individual grant recipient | $14,225 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,533 |
| Keren Ha'ir Zichron Yisroel | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,950 |
| Cheder Toras Zev | $7,085 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR5× · 2020–2024 · $332k · revenue +13%
- LCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC5× · 2020–2024 · $119k · revenue +26%
- YCYAD CHAYA INC3× · 2021–2023 · $59k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- BCBayit Chamone grant, 2022 · $76k
- TWTHE WOMANS NETWORK FOR SINGLE PARENTSone grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue +12%
- HAHatzolah Air Emergency Response Teaone grant, 2022 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Religious School
Providing jewish education to high school age students.
Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.
Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
To engage in furthering of jewish education and to provide support to torah scholars who are struggling financially.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Dmir Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
- Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
- Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMANS NETWORK FOR SINGLE PARENTS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds KUPAS YOM TOV INC ↗
- Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DVAR SHALOM ↗
- Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Jmg Foundation · Jsp Family Foundation · Lakewood Cheder School Inc · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization N & S Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cheder Toras Zev — 22% of income from government
- Bais Yaakov of Jackson Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Aleph Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.