Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myron Lewis Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$75kReligion$60kEducation$30kArts & Culture$22kHuman Services$4kHealth$2kInternational$500
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$497k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$7,275
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$6,000
VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN$5,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS$2,870
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN: $5k → 17%VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN: $3k → 17%VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN: $1k → 17%VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN: $150 → 17%VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of Myron Lewis Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in TN; by stated purpose, 67%.

Myron Lewis Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$133k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+34%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OM
    OPERA MEMPHIS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $18k · revenue +31%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2026 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE AT GERMANTOWN INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $9k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • Indiana University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • C
    CBHS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • CB
    CHRISTIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memphis Academy of Science and Engineeri

To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community

Education
2
Memphis Area Chamber of Commerce

To serve our members and partners by improving the quality of life through regional economic prosperity.

—
3
Memphis Education Fund Inc

To work in partnership with the shelby county school district and the achievement school district on strategies that support school improvement, development, and implementation of initiatives focused on increasing k-12 educational outcomes…

Education
4
University of Memphis Foundation

The foundation accepts, manages, and disburses private support to the university of memphis.

Education
5
Opera Birmingham Inc

Opera birmingham is committed to creating the finest professional opera productions, developing talent through competition and exposure to major artists, and promoting the operatic art form through community-wide education and outreach.

Arts & Culture
6
Memphis Symphony Orchestra Inc

To enrich the lives of our diverse community through exceptional music and dynamic programs.

Arts & Culture
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
9
Medaille University

Medaille university concentrates on excellence in teaching, with an emphasis on personal attention to its diverse student body. its curriculum provides a solid liberal arts and sciences foundation with early access to career-oriented…

—
10
Jewish Foundation of Memphis

The mission of the jewish foundation of memphis is to encourage charitable giving, support partner agency endowment development and to build and sustain a virbant jewish community.

Religion
11
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
12
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Essex Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL: $67,330 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELST MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $14,800 · OtherST MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLTHE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS: $10,703 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHISUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5,133 · OtherMARGOLIN HEBREW ACADEMY-YESHIVA OF THE SOUTH: $3,900 · Other+9 more: $5,100 · OtherMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $85,000 · PhilanthropyMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATIONOPERA MEMPHIS INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA MEMP…THEATRE MEMPHIS: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE ME…THE VILLAGE AT GERMANTOWN INC: $9,175 · Human ServicesIndiana University Foundation: $2,000 · EducationJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MEMPHIS AND THE MID-SOUTH INC: $500 · International
Other$106,966Philanthropy$85,000Arts & Culture$21,500Human Services$9,175Education$2,000International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $85,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetOPERA MEMPHIS INC: $18,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetST MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $14,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE AT GERMANTOWN INC: $9,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE MEMPHIS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MEMPHIS AND THE MID-SOUTH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESSEX FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERA MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE AT GERMANTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MEMPHIS AND THE MID-SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Jewish Foundation of Memphis · Plough Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myron Lewis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myron Lewis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myron Lewis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph