Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myron L and Claire B Gordon Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$477k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$413k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$417kEducation$261kPublic Safety & Disaster$153kHealth$15kHousing & Shelter$7kCivil Rights$4kInternational$4kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $413k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$4
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRFIELD COUNTY COMMUNITY FNDTN$412,740
FAIRFIELD WARDE HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
FAIRFIELD LUDLOWE HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
BASSICK HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
JOEL BARLOW HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
BRIDGEPORT AREA FOUNDATION RESCUE MISSION$1,500
STAMFORD HOSPITAL FNDTN$1,450
ST CATHERINE ACADEMY$1,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION$1,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$1,000
BACK TO SCHOOL SHOP$1,000
YALE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$600
AMERICARES$500
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREATER PHOENIX JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $100 → 11%EASTON SENIOR CENTER: $300 → 9%EASTON SENIOR CENTER: $200 → 9%EASTON SENIOR CENTER: $100 → 9%EASTON SENIOR CENTER: $50 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
IA
NJ
CT
CA
WV
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$857k · 35 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
18

Total granted

$857k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+38%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +50%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MR
    MILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +86%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • EC
    EASTON COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $600 · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Easton Senior Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAIRFIELD COUNTY COMMUNITY FNDTN: $417,040 · OtherFAIRFIELD COUNTY COMMUNITY FNDTNEASTON EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $151,600 · OtherEASTON EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICESFAIRFIELD LUDLOWE HIGH SCHOOL: $72,000 · OtherFAIRFIELD LUDLOWE HIGH SCHOOLFAIRFIELD WARDE HIGH SCHOOL: $72,000 · OtherFAIRFIELD WARDE HIGH SCHOOLBASSICK HIGH SCHOOL: $48,000 · OtherBASSICK HIGH SCHOOLJOEL BARLOW HIGH SCHOOL: $44,000 · Other+35 more: $29,350 · OtherThe Trustees of Princeton University: $7,800 · EducationYale University: $5,000 · EducationBACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC: $4,700 · EducationTHE FOOTE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $1,200 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,200 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $800 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $650 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,500 · Crime & LegalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1,000 · InternationalACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $1,000 · EnvironmentFUND TEXAS CHOICE: $650 · Environment+1 more: $50 · EnvironmentANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$833,990Education$18,700Health$6,450Crime & Legal$4,500International$3,500Environment$1,700Civil Rights$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $7,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC: $4,700 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOTE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTON SENIOR CENTER INC: $650 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFUND TEXAS CHOICE: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Easton Volunteer Fire Company No 1 Inc: $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PHOENIX JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPETUCK LAND TRUST: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds BACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOTE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTON SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Easton Volunteer Fire Company No 1 Inc ↗
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myron L and Claire B Gordon Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myron L and Claire B Gordon Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Mill River Collaborative Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Aspetuck Land Trust: 28% of income from government
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Myron L and Claire B Gordon’s filings →

More from the funding graph