· Public charity
Myriad USA Inc
Myriad usa facilitates thoughtful,effective giving across borders.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $2,452,822 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $168,624,567 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $166,171,745 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $862k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GENERATION - YOU EMPLOYED INC | $1,485,356 |
| SHIMMY TECHNOLOGIES INC | $225,000 |
| GIVE2ASIA | $150,000 |
| AMAL ACADEMY | $150,000 |
| THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST | $128,571 |
| CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK | $100,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY | $58,479 |
| UPA INC | $50,000 |
| AFRICAN VISIONARY FUND INC | $39,067 |
| URYADI'S VILLAGE INC | $22,357 |
| MEDICAL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | $16,642 |
| HOPE WORLDWIDE LTD | $10,000 |
| ACTION AGAINST HUNGER USA | $10,000 |
| THOUSAND CURRENTS | $7,350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $163M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SCIENCE ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES · TO SUPPORT ARTS AND CULTURE.
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT ARTS AND CULTURE. · TO SUPPORT AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT HEALTH ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT HEALTH ACTIVITIES.
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES
Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT SCIENCE ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT HEALTH ACTIVITIES.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 27% of Myriad USA Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC2× · 2022–2023 · $494k · revenue +114%- UVURYADIS VILLAGE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +30%
- GMGEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- ZIZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M
National Network to End Domestic Violence Incone grant, 2023 · $494k · revenue -4%- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INCone grant, 2023 · $494k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…
Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.
Middle east investment initiative, inc. (meii) stimulates sustainable economic activity and long-lasting job creation in the middle east and north africa (mena) by designing and deploying finance and technical assistance programs to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ted Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC ↗
- Who funds National Network to End Domestic Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds CODA MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK ↗
- Who funds AMAL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds TED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
- Who funds Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support Inc ↗
- Who funds URYADIS VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH & HEALTH POLICY ↗
- Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF AFRICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
- Who funds JW HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tides Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Myriad USA Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Myriad USA Inc?
Find your warmest path to Myriad USA Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.