Skip to content
Myriad USA Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Myriad USA Inc

Myriad usa facilitates thoughtful,effective giving across borders.

$169M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.7MEmployment$1.6MHealth$777kCommunity Improvement$693kYouth Development$494kCrime & Legal$494kArts & Culture$332kPhilanthropy$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $2,452,822, the rows itemized in this filing. The $168,624,567 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $166,171,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $862k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$58,479
Median grant
8
States reached
$123M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENERATION - YOU EMPLOYED INC$1,485,356
SHIMMY TECHNOLOGIES INC$225,000
AMAL ACADEMY$150,000
GIVE2ASIA$150,000
THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST$128,571
CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK$100,000
INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY$58,479
UPA INC$50,000
AFRICAN VISIONARY FUND INC$39,067
URYADI'S VILLAGE INC$22,357
MEDICAL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$16,642
ACTION AGAINST HUNGER USA$10,000
HOPE WORLDWIDE LTD$10,000
THOUSAND CURRENTS$7,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URYADI'S VILLAGE INC: $26k → 12%MEDICAL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $17k → 19%URYADI'S VILLAGE INC: $22k → 12%URYADI'S VILLAGE INC: $13k → 12%URYADI'S VILLAGE INC: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $163M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$124M · 76% · 472 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SCIENCE ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES · TO SUPPORT ARTS AND CULTURE.

Sub-Saharan Africa$12M · 8% · 162 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT ARTS AND CULTURE. · TO SUPPORT AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES

East Asia and the Pacific$8.4M · 5% · 126 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT HEALTH ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.

South Asia$8.0M · 5% · 83 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Middle East and North Africa$5.0M · 3% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

North America (Canada and Mexico)$2.6M · 2% · 25 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT HEALTH ACTIVITIES.

South America$1.5M · 1% · 39 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES

Central America and the Caribbean$343k · 0% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES · TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES

Russia and Neighboring States$225k · 0% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES · TO SUPPORT SCIENCE ACTIVITIES. · TO SUPPORT HEALTH ACTIVITIES.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of Myriad USA Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Myriad USA Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+10%

Still filing today

89%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEmploymentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $494k · revenue +114%
  • UV
    URYADIS VILLAGE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +30%
  • GM
    GEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • ZI
    ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $494k · revenue -28%
  • National Network to End Domestic Violence Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $494k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
4
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
5
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
8
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
9
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
Living Goods

Living goods aims to save lives at scale by supporting digitally empowered community health workers. we work with governments and partners to leverage smart mobile technology, rigorously strengthen performance, and relentlessly innovate to…

International
12
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Medical Ministries International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
10/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000,000 · OtherZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INCCODA MEDIA INC: $332,000 · OtherCODA MEDIA INCSHIMMY TECHNOLOGIES INC: $225,000 · OtherSHIMMY TECHNOLOGIES INCTHINKMD INC: $200,000 · OtherTHINKMD INCCHILDREN'S HEARTLINK: $200,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEARTLINKJUNTOS FINANZAS (MASTERCARD FOUNDATION): $188,300 · OtherJUNTOS FINANZAS (MASTERCARD FOUNDATION)UE LIFESCIENCES INC: $100,000 · OtherSEVAMOB VENTURES USA INC: $100,000 · OtherAYZH INC: $100,000 · Other+8 more: $272,681 · Other+8 moreGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $1,485,356 · Youth DevelopmentGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INCNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $494,395 · Youth DevelopmentNational Network to End Domestic …GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $494,395 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR …GIVE2ASIA: $300,878 · InternationalGIVE2ASIAUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $50,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF AFRICA FOUNDATION: $40,943 · InternationalAFRICAN COLLABORATIVE INC: $39,067 · International+4 more: $70,847 · International+4 moreMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $494,395 · Civil RightsThe Chicago Community Trust: $128,571 · PhilanthropyWorldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support Inc: $99,638 · PhilanthropyAMAL ACADEMY INC: $150,000 · EmploymentTED FOUNDATION INC: $143,689 · Community Improvement
Other$2,717,981Youth Development$1,979,751International$996,130Civil Rights$494,395Philanthropy$228,209Employment$150,000Community Improvement$143,689

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $1,485,356 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $494,395 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $494,395 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $494,395 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCODA MEDIA INC: $332,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $300,878 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEARTLINK: $200,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTED FOUNDATION INC: $143,689 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $128,571 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support Inc: $99,638 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetURYADIS VILLAGE INC: $68,193 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $50,508 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF AFRICA FOUNDATION: $40,943 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetAFRICAN COLLABORATIVE INC: $39,067 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGEORGES MALAIKA FOUNDATION INC: $26,749 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC: $26,748 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetMEDICAL MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $16,642 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC: $13,852 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $7,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJW HOUSE: $5,007 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Gates FoundationThe Ford FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Tides FoundationUnited Way WorldwideCharities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tides Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myriad USA Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myriad USA Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Myriad USA Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Myriad USA Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myriad USA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home