Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myra Lee and Albert Fleischman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$211k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$153kReligion$59kHealth$57kAnimals$48kPhilanthropy$48kArts & Culture$37kEnvironment$24kCivil Rights$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $211k
$211,082
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schwab Donor Advised Fund$211,082
Zamir Choral Foundation$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50 → 14%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $900 → 9%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 9%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 9%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $75 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
MD
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$448k · 50 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
19

Total granted

$448k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

48%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2017–2022 · $142k · revenue +206%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +39%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $23k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ROSEMIND GIFFORD ZOO
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • MA
    Musical Associates of Central New York
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -26%
  • MO
    MUSIUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schwab Donor Advised Fund: $211,082 · OtherSchwab Donor Advised FundPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYC: $39,600 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYCWILD LIFE BRONX CONSERVATOR SOCIIET: $30,000 · OtherWILD LIFE BRONX CONSERVATOR SOCIIETMADISON JEWISH CENTER: $25,400 · OtherMADISON JEWISH CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $19,200 · Other+51 more: $68,493 · Other+51 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $142,200 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGE…+2 more: $1,275 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $46,500 · PhilanthropyMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $18,200 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $6,875 · Arts & CultureMusical Associates of Central New York: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,725 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $910 · Arts & CultureWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $22,752 · Environment+2 more: $800 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC: $10,000 · AnimalsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$393,775International$143,475Philanthropy$46,500Arts & Culture$45,710Environment$23,552Animals$10,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $142,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $46,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $22,752 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $18,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $6,875 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMusical Associates of Central New York: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,525 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,725 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration Inc DBA The Eye-Bank of New York: $1,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE B'NAI B'RITH NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION-COVENANT HOUSE: $1,225 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $910 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $710 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $41 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Musical Associates of Central New York ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds The Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration Inc DBA The Eye-Bank of New York ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE B'NAI B'RITH NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION-COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myra Lee and Albert Fleischman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myra Lee and Albert Fleischman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Myra Lee and Albert Fleischman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Myra Lee and Albert Fleischman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Myra Lee and Albert Fleischman’s filings →

More from the funding graph