Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$315kHuman Services$138kPhilanthropy$90kArts & Culture$89kEducation$66kHealth$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM$30,000
1ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH LEXINGTON$25,000
ILLINOIS STATE FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE BABY FOLD$5,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CLINIC$5,000
TIMBER POINTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
JOSHUA TREE MINISTRIES$2,000
LEXINGTON EDUCATION ASSOC FOUNDATION$1,000
MCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
LEXINGTON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LEXINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE BABY FOLD: $30k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $30k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $30k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $30k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $5k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$734k · 12 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$734k
$40k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BABY FOLD
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +34%
  • TO
    TOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue +132%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois State Museum Society

The illinois state museum society, established in 1952, is a charitable organization recognized as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. it plays a crucial role in supporting the illinois state museum by providing financial resources and advocating for…

Arts & Culture
2
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
3
Dent County Museum

The primary purpose of the dent county museum is to promote the history of dent county, missouri and urge the preservation of its heritage through the operation of a house museum. furnishings and relics pertinent to preservation of the…

—
4
Glenview History Center

Founded in 1965, the glenview history center's mission is to preserve the cultural heritage of glenview by preserving the historic 1864 farmhouse as a museum and operating the history library with its impressive collection of historical…

—
5
Childrens Hospital of Illinois Medical Group

To support the mission of osf healthcare system, a catholic integrated health care delivery system, through the provision of quality health care services related to comprehensive inpatient and outpatient care for children.

—
6
Mchenry County Historical Society

History museum of mchenry county, illinois.

Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Children's Museum

Chicago childrens museum is a place where families and caregivers with infants and children are encouraged to create, explore, and discover together through play. the museum features three vibrant floors of exhibits and activities that…

Arts & Culture
8
Grundy County Historical Society

To provide for the people of grundy county, illinois a museum building, collection, and preservation of historical data, records, and artifacts of its people.

—
9
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
10
Litchfield Museum & Route 66 Welcome Center

To fund, create and maintain a museum and welcome center in Litchfield, Illinois, in order to educate the public on the city's rich history on Route 66 and provide space to house historical documents.

Arts & Culture
11
Glencoe Historical Society

The primary exempt purpose of the Glencoe Historical Society is to provide historical information regarding the development, people, businesses, culture, and events of Glencoe, IL

—
12
Family Medical Centers Community Foundation Inc

Family medical centers community foundation, inc.'s specific purposes shall be to operate exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of cumberland family medical center, inc.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclean County Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is University of Illinois Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

1ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH LEXINGTON: $315,200 · Other1ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH LEXINGTONILLINOIS STATE FOUNDATION: $62,000 · OtherILLINOIS STATE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $17,000 · OtherTHE BABY FOLD: $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE BABY FOLDTOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $74,000 · Arts & CultureTOWN OF NORM…MCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $14,500 · Arts & CultureMCLEAN COUNT…University of Illinois Foundation: $60,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CLINIC: $28,000 · HealthTHE TIMBER POINTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · PhilanthropyLEXINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsJOSHUA TREE MINISTRIES: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$434,200Human Services$130,000Arts & Culture$88,500Education$60,000Health$28,000Philanthropy$27,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BABY FOLD: $130,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $74,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CLINIC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TIMBER POINTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetMCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $14,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLEXINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BABY FOLD ↗
  • Who funds TOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE TIMBER POINTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA TREE MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parker Kemp FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parker Kemp Foundation · Illinois Prairie Community Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Snyder Family Foundation Nfp · The Growmark Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myers Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myers Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myers Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph