Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mydar Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Youth Development$250kHuman Services$175kHealth$139kArts & Culture$115kEnvironment$113kAnimals$94kEmployment$59kPhilanthropy$49kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Educational and Cultural Cen$115,000
A Home Within$35,000
Girl Scouts of Northern California$30,000
Monkey Tail Ranch$25,000
Portland Animal Welfare$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Marley's Mutts Dog Rescue$20,000
Manassehs Children$15,000
Girls Garage$15,000
Students Rising Above$10,000
Angling for Relief$10,000
Planet Bee Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Monkey Tail Ranch: $25k → 7%A Home Within: $20k → 10%Monkey Tail Ranch: $10k → 7%Monkey Tail Ranch: $10k → 7%MONKEY TAIL RANCH: $10k → 7%A Home Within: $35k → 10%A Home Within: $20k → 10%A HOME WITHIN INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$919k · 18 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
10

Total granted

$919k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+34%

Still filing today

72%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    3× · 2021–2023 · $195k · revenue +33%
  • AH
    A HOME WITHIN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $95k · revenue +347%
  • PA
    PORTLAND ANIMAL WELFARE TEAM
    5× · 2019–2023 · $74k · revenue +215%

Funded once

  • LL
    LA LGBT Center
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • JE
    JEWISH EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL CENTERMAKOR INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -75%
  • TM
    The Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diffgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

2
Girls Incorporated of the Central Coast

To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold and to respect themselves and the world around them.Girls Incorporated of the Central Coast offers a constellation of programs that deliver innovative, multi-faceted activities designed to…

Youth Development
3
Girlventures

GirlVentures provides outdoor programs during the summer and afterschool year round for Bay Area girls age 11-17. Our mission is to inspire girls to lead through outdoor adventure, inner discovery and collective action.

Human Services
4
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
5
Alliance for Girls

to prepare today's girls to be the leaders, agents of change, and thriving women of tomorrow. We mobilize girls' champions to address barriers facing girls, create conditions for their success, and advance systemic change to achieve equity.

Youth Development
6
Mindful Schools

Mindful school's mission is to empower educators to spark change from the inside out by cultivating awareness, resilience, and compassionate action.

Education
7
Prospect Sierra School

To educate children in grades transitional kindergarten - 8th. prospect sierra combines impactful academic experiences with a keen understanding of human emotions to help shape the world's compassionate future leaders. prospect sierra…

Unclassified
8
Santa Catalina School

Santa catalina school exists to develop in each student a striving for excellence, a maturing awareness of moral and spiritual values, a sense of responsible purpose, and a determination to serve the world with courage, grace, and…

Education
9
The Mirman School for Gifted Children

We cultivate the boundless potential of highly gifted children, nurture their passions and talents, and develop a diverse community of creative and constructive lifelong learners.

Education
10
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
11
Millennium School of San Francisco

See schedule oto realize the transformative potential of middle school. millennium school believes in developing each student to their fullest potential, this involves providing both a rigorous academic program and a science-based…

Education
12
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Manasseh's Children Dba Ujamaa-Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtq+ Community CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community FederationsVeteran Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsUnited Way FederationsEducation Equity Leadership
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%46%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%42%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr13%24%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,953

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Jewish Educational and Cultural Cen — $115,000 · OtherJewish Educational and Cultural CenECOTRUST — $50,000 · OtherECOTRUSTIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $40,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTERANGLING FOR RELIEF — $36,000 · OtherANGLING FOR RELIEFWest Valley Community Services of S — $25,000 · OtherLA LGBT Center — $20,000 · OtherSustainable Conservation — $40,000 · OtherSustainable ConservationTREVOR PROJECT INC — $25,000 · OtherMANASSEH'S CHILDREN DBA UJAMAA-AFRICA — $25,000 · OtherPLANET BEE FOUNDATION — $23,000 · OtherJEWISH EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL CENTERMAKOR INC — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $69,000 · Other+7 moreGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $195,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORT…GIRLS BUILD — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentA HOME WITHIN INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesA HOME WITHIN …The Monkey Tail Ranch Inc — $55,000 · Human ServicesThe Monkey Tai…PORTLAND ANIMAL WELFARE TEAM — $74,000 · AnimalsPORTLAND …MARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC — $20,000 · AnimalsMARLEY'S …FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE — $39,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Merced County — $10,000 · PhilanthropySUMMER SEARCH — $47,000 · EmploymentGIRLS GARAGE — $45,000 · International
Other$583,000Youth Development$205,000Human Services$150,000Animals$94,000Philanthropy$49,000Employment$47,000International$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $195,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC — $95,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetPORTLAND ANIMAL WELFARE TEAM — $74,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetThe Monkey Tail Ranch Inc — $55,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetECOTRUST — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $47,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS GARAGE — $45,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSustainable Conservation — $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE — $39,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANASSEH'S CHILDREN DBA UJAMAA-AFRICA — $25,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetPLANET BEE FOUNDATION — $23,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL CENTERMAKOR INC — $20,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff — $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Merced County — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetGIRLS BUILD — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mydar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Ecotrust14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph