· Public charity
Muscatine Charities Inc
To contribute to local charities to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the muscatine community.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y | $35,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE | $30,926 |
| MUSCATINE CTR FOR SOCIAL ACTION | $19,650 |
| LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA | $7,850 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MCMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION4× · 2017–2020 · $94k · revenue +10%
- UHUNITY HEALTHCARE2× · 2017–2019 · $32k · revenue +47%
- YSYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- SRSENIOR RESOURCES INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -27%
- PCPEARL CITY OUTREACHgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +56%
- TDTHE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +44%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the apperance of the city of muscatine
Provide housing opportunities for persons with disabilities
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
Improve communications between employers and local unions.
To contribute to local charities to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the muscatine community.
To deter and reduce crime, especially juvenile delinquency and gang activity, through organized neighborhoods by improving community living conditions and strengthening families.
Providing scholarships to students attending muscatine community college.
To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…
Faciltate a team of industry professionals to bring initiatives, education and awareness to skilled trades in iowa
How this is measured
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE ↗
- Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y ↗
- Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds MUSCATINE LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds PEARL CITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds THE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds THE JARED AND CAROL HILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · United Way of Muscatine Iowa · HNI Charitable Foundation · Jensen Private Foundation Inc · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · New Hope Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Muscatine Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Muscatine Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Muscatine Charities’ filings →