Skip to content

· Public charity

Muscatine Charities Inc

To contribute to local charities to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the muscatine community.

$115k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Youth Development$138kEducation$131kHousing & Shelter$112kPhilanthropy$101kRecreation & Sports$65kHuman Services$58kHealth$42kCrime & Legal$41kOther$0
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $93,426, the rows itemized in this filing. The $115,106 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,680 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
$30,926
Median grant
1
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y$35,000
UNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE$30,926
MUSCATINE CTR FOR SOCIAL ACTION$19,650
LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA$7,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $35k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $33k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $31k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $19k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA: $11k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA: $11k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA: $11k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA: $8k → 12%DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWA: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$564k · 13 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$564k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+56%

Still filing today

62%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $94k · revenue +10%
  • UH
    UNITY HEALTHCARE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $32k · revenue +47%
  • YS
    YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • SR
    SENIOR RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -27%
  • PC
    PEARL CITY OUTREACHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +56%
  • TD
    THE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muscatine - Beyond 2000

Improve the apperance of the city of muscatine

—
2
Muscatine Welfare Association

Provide housing opportunities for persons with disabilities

Housing & Shelter
3
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
4
Mid-Iowa Health Foundation
Religion
5
Iowa Laborers' Employers Cooperation & Education Trust

Improve communications between employers and local unions.

—
6
Muscatine Charities Inc

To contribute to local charities to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the muscatine community.

Philanthropy
7
Muscatine Safe Streets Inc

To deter and reduce crime, especially juvenile delinquency and gang activity, through organized neighborhoods by improving community living conditions and strengthening families.

—
8
Greater Des Moines Partnership Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Muscatine Community College Foundation

Providing scholarships to students attending muscatine community college.

Education
10
South Central Iowa Community Action Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…

Community Improvement
11
Iowa Skilled Trades

Faciltate a team of industry professionals to bring initiatives, education and awareness to skilled trades in iowa

Education
12
Des Moines Area Association of Realtors Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Muscatine Iowa; the most unlike its peers is The Jared and Carol Hills Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA: $124,951 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWAFRIENDS OF MUSCATINE ART CENTER INC: $24,034 · OtherFRIENDS OF MUSCATINE ART CENTER INCMUSCATINE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherMUSCATINE POLICE DEPARTMENTA CHILDS PLACE PRESCHOOL: $16,450 · OtherA CHILDS PLACE PRESCHOOLMUSCATINE BOXING CLUB: $14,730 · OtherMUSCATINE BOXING CLUBMISSISSIPPI VALLEY CHILD PROTECT: $14,209 · OtherMISSISSIPPI VALLEY CHILD PROTECTSENIOR RESOURCES INC: $10,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC: $18,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC+4 more: $22,000 · Other+4 moreMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $117,500 · Human ServicesMUSCATINE COMMUNITY YLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $41,250 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA…THE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWA: $7,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $121,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…THE JARED AND CAROL HILLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $94,450 · Community ImprovementMUSCATINE CENT…UNITY HEALTHCARE: $32,000 · HealthMUSCATINE LEGAL SERVICES: $27,000 · Crime & LegalYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$264,374Human Services$165,750Philanthropy$126,500Community Improvement$94,450Health$32,000Crime & Legal$27,000Recreation & Sports$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA: $124,951 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $121,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $117,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $94,450 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $41,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY HEALTHCARE: $32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCATINE LEGAL SERVICES: $27,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC: $18,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPEARL CITY OUTREACH: $7,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetTHE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWA: $7,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater MuscatineIA34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · United Way of Muscatine Iowa · HNI Charitable Foundation · Jensen Private Foundation Inc · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · New Hope Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Muscatine Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Muscatine Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Muscatine Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph