Skip to content

· Private foundation

Murphy Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.9MYouth Development$332kEducation$165kCommunity Improvement$57kRecreation & Sports$44kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$22kReligion$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF TRAIL$1,030,002
SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS$30,696
GIRLS ON THE RUN$18,017
JXTA$12,000
MIGIZI$11,715
GLENMERCY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,000
ROSSLAND SUMMIT SCHOOL$4,000
SANCTUARY CHILDREN'S HOUSE$4,000
FAMILY ACTION NETWORK$4,000
NORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$3,000
FRUITVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$3,000
MINNESOTA SLED HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS BC$2,758
GREATER TRAIL MINER HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$2,758
WEBSTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 23% of grant dollars ($621k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 77% that went abroad ($2.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%NORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $3k → 9%WOODRIDGE CHURCH: $10k → 11%ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 18%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $8k → 15%DREAM BUILDERS 4 EQUITY: $5k → 21%STAND UP FOR KIDS: $4k → 14%STAND UP FOR KIDS CHICAGO: $11k → 14%THUNDER VALLEY CDC: $20k → 42%FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%NORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $3k → 9%WOODRIDGE CHURCH: $10k → 11%ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 18%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $8k → 15%FAMILY ACTION NETWORK: $4k → 14%FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%MINNESOTA SLED HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $3k → 11%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 15%FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%MINNESOTA SLED HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $3k → 11%MINNESOTA SLED HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $3k → 11%FREE ARTS ON MINNESOTA: $10k → 11%MIGIZI: $12k → 11%JXTA: $12k → 11%MIGIZI: $10k → 11%JXTA: $10k → 11%MIGIZI: $10k → 11%JXTA: $10k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $31k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $30k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $30k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $30k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $30k → 11%MN SLED HOCKEY: $15k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $30k → 11%MINNESOTA NEONATAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%MN SLED HOCKEY: $10k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $11k → 11%MN SLED HOCKEY: $10k → 11%SPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $10k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $20k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $18k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $15k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $15k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $15k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $15k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $11k → 11%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 77% of all-years giving ($2.0M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$2.0M · 57 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 23 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$2.6M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+76%

Still filing today

22%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $80k · revenue +30%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +87%
  • NC
    NORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TV
    THUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -35%
  • SU
    STAND UP FOR KIDS CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • FA
    FREE ARTS ON MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy
2
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
3
Facing Foster Care in Alaska

Facing Foster Care in Alaska (FFCA) is a nonprofit dedicated to improving the foster care system, developing leadership skills among current and former foster youth ages 15-24, and creating a network of peer support for foster youth…

Crime & Legal
4
The Minnesota Fastbreak Foundation

The mission of the minnesota fastbreak foundation is to have a meaningful impact in the communities where we live, work and play.

Human Services
5
Minnesota Action Network Inc

To create, encourage, and promote center right policies based on the principles of freedom, limited government, American exceptionalism, and strong policies in the state of MN, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which…

Public Benefit
6
Safe Passage for Children of Minnesota

Safe Passage for Children of Minnesota is a citizens' group that advocates for improvements in Minnesota's child welfare system. Our mission is to ensure that Minnesota has a child welfare system in which children are safe and reach their…

Crime & Legal
7
Citizens for a Safer Minnesota

Primary Exempt Purpose- Protect Minnesota Advocacy fund supports the mission of Protect Minnesota to prevent gun violence through legislative actions community education and fudn development.

—
8
Far Southeast Family Strengtening

To provide services so children and families have opportunities to lead productive lives.

Human Services
9
Future Soccer Inc

Our vision: a future where all youth have access to a quality coach and mentor, encouraging them to chase their dreams

Recreation & Sports
10
Nebraska Family Support Network

To provide support and advocacy to families of children. build confidence in parents by providing the necessary tools for appropriate decisions and actions. informing parents of their rights and to assist in problem resolution.

—
11
Family Network on Disabilities of Florida Inc

Family Network on Disabilities is a national network of individuals of all ages who may be at-risk, have disabilities, or have special needs and their families, professionals, and concerned citizens. The mission of family Network on…

—
12
Family Promise of Northern New Castle County

Prevent and end homelessness for families by engaging faith-based congregations, volunteers and donors.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Action Network; the most unlike its peers is Dream Builders 4 Equity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF TRAIL: $1,914,302 · OtherCITY OF TRAILSPARKY- Y YOUTH LABS: $201,696 · OtherSPARKY- Y YOUTH LABSGIRLS ON THE RUN: $119,294 · Other+32 more: $267,183 · Other+32 moreFITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · EducationNORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,500 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAM BUILDERS 4 EQUITY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $20,000 · Community ImprovementMN WILD SLED PROGRAM: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsMINNESOTA NEONATAL FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Health
Other$2,502,475Education$85,500Youth Development$25,000Community Improvement$20,000Recreation & Sports$8,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMN WILD SLED PROGRAM: $8,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM BUILDERS 4 EQUITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMINNESOTA NEONATAL FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFAMILY ACTION NETWORK: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds THUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR ↗
  • Who funds MN WILD SLED PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DREAM BUILDERS 4 EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA NEONATAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds StandUp for Kids ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ACTION NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Murphy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Murphy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Murphy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph