Skip to content

· Private foundation

Muriel Whiteside Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$264k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$2.7MEducation$1.7MHealth$1.6MPhilanthropy$1.5MYouth Development$1.5MAnimals$814kArts & Culture$409kReligion$210kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $521k
$117,969
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA$263,656
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTHLAND$257,670
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL$235,937
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL$235,937
YWCA DULUTH$220,191
THE DEPOT FOUNDATION$117,969
ANIMAL ALLIES HUMANE SOCIETY$117,969
HEAD OF THE LAKES UNITED WAY$101,116
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$33,705
WDSE-WRPT$33,705
DULUTH SUPERIOR SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$33,705
PILGRIM CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$33,705
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $264k → 15%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $215k → 16%YWCA DULUTH: $220k → 15%DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $166k → 15%YWCA DULUTH: $166k → 15%YWCA DULUTH: $154k → 15%DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $154k → 15%YWCA DULUTH: $130k → 15%DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $130k → 15%YWCA DULUTH: $75k → 15%DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $75k → 15%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $73k → 15%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $73k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
MD
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 17 repeat orgs$861k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$9.6M
$625k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+11%

Still filing today

65%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +25%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DULUTH
    5× · 2018–2025 · $818k · revenue +69%
  • TD
    THE DEPOT FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $803k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2024 · $215k · revenue -22%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN
    one grant, 2024 · $215k
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MANKATO INC
    one grant, 2018 · $73k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Mens Christian Association of Oswego Inc

The oswego ymca is a leading not-for-profit united in a common goal to strengthen the greater oswego community and develop the spirit, mind and body of all persons, regardless of means, through activities guided by and based upon our core…

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association

We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.

Human Services
3
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Honolulu

Strengthening communities is the y's cause through programs and services focused on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility.

Human Services
5
Duluth Cross Country Ski Club

Promote health through skiing

Recreation & Sports
6
Itasca County Family Ymca Inc

The itasca county family ymca (ymca) is a charitable, community service organization founded in 1979 with a mission to strengthen ourselves, families and communities by promoting growth in spirit, mind and body. the ymca includes men,…

Human Services
7
Winona Family Ymca Inc

The winona family ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families and strong…

—
8
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

—
9
Summit Area Young Men's Christian Association a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of the summit area ymca is to strengthen the foundations of community by nurturing and developing the potential of every child, promoting healthy living and fostering a sense of social responsibility in the community.

Human Services
10
Nexus Youth and Families

Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

Human Services
11
Young Women's Christian Association of Rock County Inc

Ywca rock county is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
The New Canaan Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The new canaan community ymca's mission is to enrich all people in spirit, mind and body. we are committed to providing programs and services that promote youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility among our members and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Duluth Area Family Ymca; the most unlike its peers is The Depot Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMDMEDICAL SCHOOL: $1,312,547 · OtherUMDMEDICAL SCHOOLST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $1,008,655 · OtherST LUKE'S HOSPITALTHE DEPOT FOUNDATION: $802,636 · OtherTHE DEPOT FOUNDATIONYWCA: $426,374 · OtherYWCAYMCA: $426,374 · OtherYMCAUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL: $235,937 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN: $215,228 · OtherPILGRIM CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $209,729 · Other+7 more: $257,532 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DULUTH: $818,376 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRIST…DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $788,747 · Human ServicesDULUTH AREA FAMILY Y…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $215,228 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTI…THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MANKATO INC: $73,094 · Human ServicesBOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH: $1,191,243 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS' CLUB O…ANIMAL ALLIES HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $772,668 · AnimalsHEAD OF THE LAKES UNITED WAY: $709,572 · PhilanthropyST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF DULUTH: $539,829 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $63,363 · HealthDULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION: $209,729 · Arts & CultureDULUTH SUPERIOR SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIO: $199,058 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,895,012Human Services$1,895,445Youth Development$1,191,243Animals$772,668Philanthropy$709,572Health$603,192Arts & Culture$408,787

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH: $1,191,243 over 8y, 10.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DULUTH: $818,376 over 5y, 13% of budgetTHE DEPOT FOUNDATION: $802,636 over 8y, 20% of budgetDULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA: $788,747 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetANIMAL ALLIES HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $772,668 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetHEAD OF THE LAKES UNITED WAY: $709,572 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF DULUTH: $539,829 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $215,228 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION: $209,729 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDULUTH SUPERIOR SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIO: $199,058 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MANKATO INC: $73,094 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $63,363 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHI GAMMI CLUB: $231 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS' CLUB OF DULUTH ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DULUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE DEPOT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ALLIES HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAD OF THE LAKES UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF DULUTH ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds DULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DULUTH SUPERIOR SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIO ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MANKATO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHI GAMMI CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duluth-Superior Area Community FoundationMN22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Northland Foundation · Pachel Foundation · Ordean Foundation · Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Minnesota Power Foundation · American Gift Fund · St Luke's Hospital of Duluth · Head of the Lakes United Way · Smdc Medical Center · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Muriel Whiteside Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Muriel Whiteside Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Muriel Whiteside Charitable Tr?

    Find your warmest path to Muriel Whiteside Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Muriel Whiteside Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph