Skip to content

· Private foundation

Muralt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$281kHuman Services$106kEducation$79kFood & Nutrition$31kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$19kReligion$9kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$14,170
Median grant
1
States reached
$917k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES$70,450
YMCA$14,170
FAMILES FIRST LEARNING LAB$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $10k → 9%WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $4k → 9%WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $3k → 9%MISSOULA YOUTH HOMES: $3k → 9%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $16k → 9%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 9%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $12k → 9%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 9%MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$509k · 15 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$509k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+34%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA
    5× · 2018–2022 · $53k · revenue +90%
  • MF
    MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $27k · revenue +38%
  • CF
    CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCE COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONS & PROG
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • MH
    MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • MC
    MISSOULA CHILDRENS THEATRE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
2
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Montana

Keeping families with a sick child/children close to the care and resources they need, when it matters the most.

Health
4
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Missoula Community School

To provide early high-quality education to children in the missoula community ages 2 to 6 years.

Education
6
Missoula International School

Missoula international school inspires principled global citizens and lifelong learners through a challenging bilingual education from preschool to eighth grade.

Education
7
Scenic Montana Trails
—
8
Missoula Area Chamber of Commerce

An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.

—
9
Mississippi Children's Museum

We create unparalleled experiences to inspire excellence and a lifelong joy of learning.

Arts & Culture
10
Missoula Mountain Bike Coalition

Missoula mountain bike coalition's mission is to promote and create mountain biking opportunities in missoula and surrounding areas through trail building, stewardship, advocacy and outreach.

Recreation & Sports
11
Ywca Missoula

Ywca missoula is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
Valley Community Emergency Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to end hunger in the valley county, montana area through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. our vision is a montana free from hunger where everyone has equal access to nutritious food.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Home Montana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Missoula Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES: $281,260 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER CHARITIESUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONS: $40,790 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONSCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $23,500 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCE COUNCIL INCUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONS & PROG: $19,000 · OtherFAMILES FIRST LEARNING LAB: $17,050 · Other+8 more: $52,970 · Other+8 moreGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $52,650 · Human ServicesGREATER MISSOULA…YOUTH HOMES: $13,875 · Human ServicesYOUTH HOMESMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN HOME MO…WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $6,047 · Human ServicesWATSON CHILDREN'…MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $26,700 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $4,700 · Food & NutritionMISSOULA CIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $10,500 · Arts & CultureMISSOULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA: $2,500 · Health
Other$434,570Human Services$82,572Food & Nutrition$31,400Arts & Culture$10,500Philanthropy$2,500Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA: $52,650 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $26,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $23,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetYOUTH HOMES: $13,875 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA CIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $6,047 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $4,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA CIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MCT INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Max and Betty Swanson FoundationMT22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way of Missoula County · Werler Family Charitable Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation · Louis L Borick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Muralt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Muralt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Muralt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph