Skip to content

· Private foundation

Munster Scholarship Trust 31p002012

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$311kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$2kReligion$2kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$34,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$582k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scholarship Listing Attached$34,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MN TWIN CITIES: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $2k → 14%Saint Mary's University of MN: $2k → 14%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%WINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $5k → 13%NOVA SOUTHESTERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $4k → 17%CONCORIDA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 6%UW - RIVER FALLS: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $3k → 10%UW - STEVENS POINT: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER: $4k → 10%BELOIT COLLEGE: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WI - STOUT: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WI - OSHKOSH: $3k → 11%UW - EAU CLAIRE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WI LA CROSSE: $5k → 12%UW - PLATTEVILLE: $2k → 13%MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $2k → 17%TAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%UNIVERSTIY OF MN TWIN CITIES: $2k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $7k → 10%UW OSHKOSH: $2k → 11%UW - EAU CLAIRE: $3k → 12%UW - LA CROSSE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WI LA CROSSE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MN TWIN CITIES: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WI LA CROSSE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WI LA CROSSE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $2k → 10%UW - LA CROSSE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $2k → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
AZ
TN
SC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 25 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
47

Total granted

$199k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+17%

Still filing today

28%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +46%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    4× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • UM
    UW MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
12
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Scholarship Listing Attached: $34,500 · OtherScholarship Listing AttachedUNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISON: $29,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WI - MADISONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $26,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $19,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF WI LA CROSSE: $13,000 · OtherUW - LA CROSSE: $11,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WI - OSHKOSH: $9,500 · Other+46 more: $112,250 · Other+46 moreMarquette University: $12,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY I…MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $9,250 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF EN…ALMA COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationALMA COLLEGEST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $3,500 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INCBELOIT COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationTaylor University: $2,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 · Education+14 more: $17,500 · Education+14 more
Other$255,000Education$64,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $9,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTaylor University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds ALMA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Taylor University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herb Kohl Educational Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Culver's Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Casper Foundation · Sc Johnson Giving Inc · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Munster Scholarship Trust 31p002012 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Munster Scholarship Trust 31p002012. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Munster Scholarship Trust 31p002012’s filings →

More from the funding graph