Skip to content

· Private foundation

Muncrief Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.9MHealth$1.2MArts & Culture$634kReligion$583kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kRecreation & Sports$30kHuman Services$21kFood & Nutrition$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $487k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.2M
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSU FOUNDATION$1,715,592
OKLA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION$500,000
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$201,000
NATL COWBOY WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM$115,544
MEMORIAL ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST$108,000
OKC NATIONAL MEMORIAL MUSEUM$62,500
HEARTS FOR HEARING$20,000
UNIV OF OKLA-H HAMM DIABETES CENTER$18,750
OKC POLICE FOUNDATION$10,363
PHI DELTA THETA FOUNDATION$10,000
SAM THE I CAN MAN FOUNDATION$5,000
ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION$2,000
FOCUS ON HOME$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $30k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $20k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $20k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $10k → 16%SAM THE I CAN MAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%ANNAS HOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%KWCO CARES: $1k → 16%KWCO CARES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 22 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$5.3M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-1%

Still filing today

59%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +63%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +20%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $627k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • S6
    SHIELD 616 INC
    one grant, 2021 · $32k · revenue -29%
  • FF
    FIELDS FUTURES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
4
Eastern Oklahoma State College Development Foundation Inc

The Foundation's primary purpose is to provide resources and to seek external support for scholarships, faculty development, equipment, and campus projects, which support Eastern Oklahoma State College, a community college in Southeast…

Education
5
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
6
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation

Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.

Recreation & Sports
7
The State Chamber Research Foundation

The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

Unclassified
8
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Ok Foundation

Serving the needs of the whole child, including education, safety, environment, health, and well-being.

Philanthropy
10
Cowboy Hall of Fame Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

To support the oklahoma city community foundation by supporting the national cowboy and western heritage museum.

Arts & Culture
11
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
12
Opportunity Scholarship Fund

The Opportunity Scholarship Fund is a scholarship granting organization that provides scholarships to Oklahoma prek-12 students to attend accredited private schools in our state. Once a student has received a scholarship, that student and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sam the I Can Man Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oklahoma State University Foundation: $2,239,657 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation+2 more: $14,500 · EducationCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $627,000 · OtherCHI OMEGA FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $578,500 · OtherMEMORIAL ROAD CHURCH OF CHRISTNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $518,708 · OtherNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSE…OKC NATIONAL MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $85,000 · Other+19 more: $183,553 · Other+19 moreOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $1,019,000 · HealthOklahoma Medical Rese…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthHearts for Hearing Foundation: $79,760 · Human ServicesTHE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Human ServicesSAM THE I CAN MAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesSHIELD 616 INC: $32,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $6,100 · Food & NutritionFOCUS ON HOME INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterChristian Chronicle Inc: $100 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,254,157Other$1,992,761Health$1,029,000Human Services$95,260Crime & Legal$32,000Food & Nutrition$6,100Housing & Shelter$1,000Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $2,239,657 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $1,019,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $627,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $518,708 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $79,760 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC: $32,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPhi Delta Theta Foundation: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Christian University: $12,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $6,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKWCO CARES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOCUS ON HOME INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHIELD 616 INC ↗
  • Who funds Phi Delta Theta Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KWCO CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Chronicle Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Cresap Family Foundation · Love Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Branch Family Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Muncrief Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Muncrief Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Christian University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Muncrief Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Muncrief Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Muncrief Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph