· Private foundation
Muncrief Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $59k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $487k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OSU FOUNDATION | $1,715,592 |
| OKLA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION | $201,000 |
| NATL COWBOY WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM | $115,544 |
| MEMORIAL ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST | $108,000 |
| OKC NATIONAL MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $62,500 |
| HEARTS FOR HEARING | $20,000 |
| UNIV OF OKLA-H HAMM DIABETES CENTER | $18,750 |
| OKC POLICE FOUNDATION | $10,363 |
| PHI DELTA THETA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SAM THE I CAN MAN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| FOCUS ON HOME | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOklahoma State University Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +63%
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation3× · 2023–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +20%
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $627k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- S6SHIELD 616 INCone grant, 2021 · $32k · revenue -29%
- FFFIELDS FUTURESone grant, 2023 · $10k
- OCOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIALone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students
The Foundation's primary purpose is to provide resources and to seek external support for scholarships, faculty development, equipment, and campus projects, which support Eastern Oklahoma State College, a community college in Southeast…
To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.
The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
Serving the needs of the whole child, including education, safety, environment, health, and well-being.
To support the oklahoma city community foundation by supporting the national cowboy and western heritage museum.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
The Opportunity Scholarship Fund is a scholarship granting organization that provides scholarships to Oklahoma prek-12 students to attend accredited private schools in our state. Once a student has received a scholarship, that student and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sam the I Can Man Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
- Who funds SHIELD 616 INC ↗
- Who funds Phi Delta Theta Foundation ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KWCO CARES INC ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ON HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Chronicle Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Cresap Family Foundation · Love Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Branch Family Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Muncrief Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Oklahoma Christian University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Muncrief Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Muncrief Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.