How much did MUELLER HOISEL WANGER CHARITABLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of MUELLER HOISEL WANGER CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE WRIGHT MUSEUM$3,000
LYNN HOUSE OF POTOMAX VALLEY$3,000
BROADVIEW INC$3,000
arden wood$3,000
Twelve Acres$3,000
Chestnut Hill Benevolent Assoc$3,000
ASHER STUDENT FOUNDATION$3,000
First Church of Christ Scientist$3,000
ALBERT BAKER FUND$3,000
Camps NewfoundOwatonna$3,000
Symphony New HaMpshire$3,000
WIDE HORIZONS INC$3,000
RHODE ISLAND COMPUTER MUSEUM$3,000
HIGH RIDGE HOUSE$3,000
The Principle Foundation$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$509k · 22 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$509k

$25k

Still filing today

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PEACE HAVEN ASSOC
4× · 2019–2023 · $31k · revenue +35%
AS
Asher Student Foundation
7× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +152%
DI
Daystar Inc
7× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

TH
TALLWOODS HOUSE
one grant, 2021 · $15k
CS
C S NURSING SVC NH
one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Visiting Christian Science Nursing

Nursing care for christian scientists.

Health

New England Baptist Hospital

The mission of the new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is committed to improving the health of the communities served by providing high quality, personalized health care with compassion, dignity and respect for patient rights…

Health

The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health

Christian Science Nursing Care Endowment

Providing financial support to non-profit care facilities for nursing/care.

Human Services

Sunrise Haven

Christian science nursing-inspiring, loving, and healing humanity. sunrise haven exists to provide an environment conducive to spiritual healing for the practice of christian science nursing as established in the church manual bylaw.

Health

Christ's Hospital

—

Desert View

Desert views mission is to support an individuals healing practice of christian science by providing christian science nursing whenever there is a need.

—

Newport Hospital Foundation

Newport Hospital Foundation (NHF) coordinates fundraising in support of comprehensive integrated health care services for the advancement and well-being of the southern Rhode Island community, in furtherance of the purposes of Newport…

Health

National Fund for Christian Science

To help individuals gain access to christian science care

Health

American Scientific Affiliation

ASA's unique mission is to interpret, integrate, and communicate the discoveries of science with the insights of Scripture and Christian theology.

Religion

Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—

Arbor Research Collaborative for

To improve patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chestnut Hill Benevolent Association and the most unlike its peers is Asher Student Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

4/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$314,500Education$122,500Health$35,500Religion$31,000Arts & Culture$15,500Human Services$14,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tenacre FoundationNJ26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tenacre Foundation · The Isabel Foundation · Joseph Warren Foundation · The Thomas and Michele Parsons Family · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MUELLER HOISEL WANGER CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RHODE ISLAND COMPUTER MUSEUM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~34 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +83% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 050493695 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on RHODE ISLAND COMPUTER MUSEUM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 34 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MUELLER HOISEL WANGER CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable?

More from the funding graph

MUELLER HOISEL WANGER CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mueller Hoisel Wanger Charitable?

More from the funding graph