Skip to content
Mtw Services Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Mtw Services Inc

We provide referral information, personal services, and emotional support for families with mentally and physically disabled children and adults.

$1.4M
Granted FY2022
27
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$480k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $1,301,961, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,413,361 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $111,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k9 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $491k
  • $250k+1 grant · $480k
$12,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$130k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Talmud Torah Ohr Moshe$480,000
Cong Yeshiva Avir Yakov$240,765
Congregation Zemach David$150,000
Global Center of Skver$99,800
Shekel Hakodesh$49,020
Cong oseh choyil$40,100
Bonei Olam$24,720
Cong Kehilas Belz USA$19,900
Yeshous Yisroel$18,600
Congregation Bnos Toras Emachu Inc$17,720
Talmud Torah Tashbar$16,000
Mikvah Yisroel$15,400
Cong of New Square$13,406
Cong Square Mosdos$12,200
Cong Sdei Yosef Inc$10,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Bonei Olam: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TALMUD TORAH OHR MOSHE: $480,000 · OtherTALMUD TORAH OHR MOSHECONGREGATION YESHIVA AVIR YAKOV: $240,765 · OtherCONGREGATION YESHIVA AVIR YAKOVCONGREGATION ZEMACH DAVID: $150,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZEMACH DAVIDGLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER: $99,800 · OtherGLOBAL CENTER OF SKVERSHEKEL HAKODESH: $49,020 · OtherCONGREGATION OSEH CHOYIL INC: $47,600 · Other+16 more: $189,356 · Other+16 moreBonei Olam Inc: $24,720 · Human ServicesCONG SQUARE MOSDOS INC: $12,200 · EducationYAD LTALMID INC: $8,500 · Religion
Other$1,256,541Human Services$24,720Education$12,200Religion$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBonei Olam Inc: $24,720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONG SQUARE MOSDOS INC: $12,200 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYAD LTALMID INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONG SQUARE MOSDOS INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD LTALMID INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundThe Gds FoundationMezritch FoundationCco ServicesLodz Charitable TrustBreuer Charitable Fou…Rachels FoundationTorah & Chesed FundThe Pillars TrustAni Mamin FoundationThe Light of Chaim Fo…The H y K Foundation
The Ojc FundNY35.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Gds Foundation · Mezritch Foundation · Cco Services · Lodz Charitable Trust · Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc · Rachels Foundation · Torah & Chesed Fund · The Pillars Trust · Ani Mamin Foundation · The Light of Chaim Foundation · The H y K Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mtw Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mtw Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mtw Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home