Skip to content
Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation

The Mt.

$7.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
69
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$24MHealth$14MEducation$6.8MHuman Services$5.2MCommunity Improvement$1.9MCivil Rights$1.2MCrime & Legal$822kPublic Benefit$645kOther$0
02FY2025 · 69 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $635k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.7M
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$190M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Case Western Reserve University$1,000,000
MetroHealth System$500,000
Health Policy Institute of Ohio$450,000
Jewish Federation of Cleveland$450,000
Jewish Federation of Cleveland$450,000
Jewish Federation of Cleveland$450,000
Jewish Federation of Cleveland$450,000
Cuyahoga County$400,000
United Way of Greater Cleveland$300,000
Educational Service Center of Northeast Ohio$250,000
Bikur Cholim of Cleveland$180,000
Jewish Federations of North America$175,000
Birthing Beautiful Communities$150,000
Cleveland State University$147,395
Planned Parenthood$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $180k → 17%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $60k → 17%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $55k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $55k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $55k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $50k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $50k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $49k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $71k → 17%MAY DUGAN: $54k → 17%May Dugan: $30k → 17%Snr Transportation Connection of Cuyahoga: $437k → 17%May Dugan Center: $26k → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $174k → 17%Senior Transportation Connection: $124k → 17%Snr Transportation Connection of Cuyahoga: $111k → 17%Senior Transportation Connection: $108k → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION OF CUYAHOGA COUNT: $40k → 17%Hospice of Western Reserve: $42k → 17%Goods Bank NEO: $150k → 17%The CentersCircle Health: $100k → 17%The CentersCircle Health: $100k → 17%COLLABORATION STATION: $97k → 17%Centers for Families and Children: $65k → 17%COLLABORATION STATION: $40k → 17%Harvard Community Services Center: $47k → 17%PREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 17%PREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITIES RESOURCE CENTER: $44k → 17%University Settlement Inc: $40k → 17%KOINONIA HOMES INC: $60k → 17%Agudath Israel of Ohio (Gesher): $64k → 17%HOMELESS HOOKUP: $63k → 17%Homeless Hookup: $50k → 17%Agudath Israel of Ohio (Gesher): $45k → 17%Cleveland Sight Center: $100k → 17%Joseph and Mary's Home: $75k → 17%JOSEPH'S HOME: $52k → 17%Joseph's Home: $52k → 17%JOSEPH AND MARY'S HOME: $25k → 17%The Mandel Jewish Comm Center of Cleveland: $150k → 17%Menorah Park Center for Senior Living: $150k → 17%YMCA of Greater Cleveland: $96k → 17%Care Alliance: $83k → 17%Asian Services in Action Inc (ASIA Inc): $50k → 17%Waiting Child Fund: $50k → 17%Care Alliance Health Center: $50k → 17%YMCA of Greater Cleveland: $36k → 17%YMCA of Greater Cleveland: $32k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mt Sinai Health Care Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31M · 98 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

98 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
73

Total granted

$31M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+5%

Still filing today

90%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $404k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +50%
  • TM
    THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +91%
  • HP
    HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +69% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • MP
    MENORAH PARK CENTER FOR SENIOR LIVING
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue -93%
  • M
    MILESTONES
    one grant, 2024 · $120k · revenue -12%
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $110k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
2
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
3
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

—
4
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
5
Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights
6
Jewish Family Services

To help individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and emotional stability.

Human Services
7
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
8
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
9
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
10
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
11
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
12
Physicians Care Connection

Physicians careconnection (pcc) mission is to optimize health for individuals experiencing healthcare challenges due to personal and systemic barriers.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Veggie U. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

177 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 177 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
168/177
Grantees still filing
112/177
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $21,011,836 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELANDTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $995,000 · Philanthropy+7 more: $1,604,560 · Philanthropy+7 moreTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,041,413 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FO…HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO: $1,393,000 · HealthHEALTH POLICY INST…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $915,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $612,572 · HealthUNIVERSITY HOSPITA…MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES: $422,401 · HealthUNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE ACTION NETWORK OF OHIO INC: $385,000 · HealthNaaleh Cleveland Inc: $368,015 · HealthOhioGuidestone: $335,009 · HealthCANOPY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $333,989 · Health+34 more: $2,715,715 · Health+34 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $5,921,666 · EducationCASE WESTERN R…GROUNDWORK OHIO: $350,000 · EducationBIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES: $320,000 · Education+16 more: $951,608 · Education+16 moreCUYAHOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD: $875,750 · OtherCUYAHOGA COUNTY …MOBILEMED1 INC DBA MEDWORKS: $770,000 · OtherMOBILEMED1 INC D…LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $660,000 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIET…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $532,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHR…PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $510,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE…EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $357,500 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH: $307,850 · OtherJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $359,404 · OtherLINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL: $326,400 · Other+64 more: $3,814,443 · Other+64 moreSENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $1,021,400 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $588,500 · Human ServicesThe Centers for Families and Children: $265,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HOME: $216,941 · Human ServicesNear Westside MultiService Corp: $191,154 · Human ServicesThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $172,500 · Human ServicesGOODS BANK NEO: $170,000 · Human ServicesCOLLABORATION STATION: $167,997 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND: $164,517 · Human ServicesMENORAH PARK CENTER FOR SENIOR LIVING: $150,000 · Human ServicesCARE ALLIANCE: $143,334 · Human Services+18 more: $873,097 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $1,127,000 · Community ImprovementOhio Womens Alliance: $556,187 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $387,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE OF HEALING: $200,000 · Community ImprovementOHIO CITY INCORPORATED: $100,000 · Community ImprovementGreater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers: $100,000 · Community Improvement+6 more: $74,450 · Community ImprovementHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $260,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $195,250 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$24,636,396Health$9,522,114Education$7,543,274Other$8,513,347Human Services$4,124,440Community Improvement$2,544,637Food & Nutrition$455,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $21,011,836 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $5,921,666 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,041,413 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetHEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO: $1,393,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $1,127,000 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $1,021,400 over 7y, 16% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $995,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $915,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMOBILEMED1 INC DBA MEDWORKS: $770,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $660,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $612,572 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $588,500 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetOhio Womens Alliance: $556,187 over 2y, 17% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $545,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $532,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $510,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES: $422,401 over 6y, 14% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $387,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE ACTION NETWORK OF OHIO INC: $385,000 over 9y, 30% of budgetNaaleh Cleveland Inc: $368,015 over 6y, 16% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $359,404 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetGROUNDWORK OHIO: $350,000 over 3y, 86% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $335,009 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCANOPY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $333,989 over 2y, 26% of budgetLINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL: $326,400 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetBIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES: $320,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC: $313,481 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH: $307,850 over 3y, 25% of budgetCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER: $280,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children: $265,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $260,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetABORTION FORWARD ALLIANCE: $238,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetINMOTION: $237,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetJOSEPHS HOME: $216,941 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST CAMPERS INC: $200,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFORCES4QUALITY NORTHEAST OHIO: $200,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetVILLAGE OF HEALING: $200,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $195,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNear Westside MultiService Corp: $191,154 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $187,395 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $181,573 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $175,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $172,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGOODS BANK NEO: $170,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $168,804 over 4y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
  • Who funds MOBILEMED1 INC DBA MEDWORKS ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Womens Alliance ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE ACTION NETWORK OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Naaleh Cleveland Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORK OHIO ↗
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
  • Who funds CANOPY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Centers for Families and Children ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION FORWARD ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds INMOTION ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPHS HOME ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST CAMPERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…The Char and Chuck Fo…United Way of Greater…The Cleveland Clinic …Jewish Federation of …Higley Fund of the Cl…The Cleveland Clinic …Saint Lukes Foundatio…Sisters of Charity Fo…Woodruff FoundationCommunity West Founda…
The Cleveland FoundationOH143.9× affinity95 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Woodruff Foundation · Community West Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 188 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mt Sinai Health Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home