Skip to content
Mrs Charity Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Mrs Charity Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$348kReligion$98kHuman Services$22kHealth$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kInternational$9kPhilanthropy$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$365
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$22,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $22k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$613k · 11 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$613k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+67%

Still filing today

36%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Nova Southeastern University Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $288k · revenue +45%
  • HS
    HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue ×28
  • SH
    SCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $22k · revenue +67%
  • CO
    CHESED OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
2
Yotzer Ohr Inc

Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…

Education
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Yeshiva University High Schools

The yeshiva university high schools has as its educational mission to teach and perpetuate the values of torah and secular studies. see schedule o.

Education
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Miami Torah Center Inc

To inspire and engage jews of all ages and backgrounds to develop and expand themselves through the study of the bible.

—
8
Tamim Academies
Philanthropy
9
The Center for Jewish Life Miami Inc

The center for jewish life is a kehillah-an important hub for the entire central miami community. the center is a home-base for jewish communal life and living.

Religion
10
Miami Jewish Montessori Inc

Through the timeless montessori method, we enable children to explore and establish a meaningful connection to their jewish soul by offering an education that is predicated upon mutual respect and whole-hearted communication. our…

Education
11
Baltimore Torah School Inc

The mission of baltimore torah school, inc., a boys school for grades 8- 12, is to produce young men who are motivated to find satisfaction and joy in learning and serving g-d, capable of advancing to excellent advanced jewish study…

Education
12
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $155,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACH: $73,332 · OtherCHABAD OF GOLDEN BEACHUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FUND: $45,833 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FUNDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YITZHAK RABIN: $17,500 · OtherOSTER HEALING FUND: $12,000 · Other+15 more: $28,974 · Other+15 moreNova Southeastern University Inc: $288,250 · EducationNova Southeastern University IncFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $630 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $21,660 · Human ServicesHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $12,998 · Public Safety & DisasterFRIENDS OF YAJAD VENEZUELA INC: $3,600 · ReligionMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC: $750 · ReligionTOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $54 · Philanthropy
Other$332,739Education$298,880Human Services$21,660Public Safety & Disaster$12,998Religion$4,350Youth Development$2,000Health$1,000Philanthropy$54

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $288,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $21,660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $12,998 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAJAD VENEZUELA INC: $3,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3,282 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASHMA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE VICTORY CENTER INC: $130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAJAD VENEZUELA INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHECK HILLEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TASHMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGELING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Miami Jewish …Mightycause Charitabl…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Miami Jewish Federation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mrs Charity Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mrs Charity Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mrs Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home