How much did MP FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2019?

MP FOUNDATION INC reported 23 grants totaling $22,299 in its FY2019 IRS filing.

Where is MP FOUNDATION INC based?

MP FOUNDATION INC is based in FL.

MP FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Private foundation

MP FOUNDATION INC

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$22k

Granted FY2019

Grants

Communities

$5k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2019 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$495

Median grant

States reached

$11k

Total assets

Largest grants

INDIVIDUAL GRANTS$5,062
JEM FOUNDATION INC$3,500
CHABAD OCEAN SYNAGOGUE INC$1,760
ASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC$1,500
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$1,420
CHABAD OF THE WATERWAYS$1,265
CHABAD TORAH CENTER INC$1,157
SALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY$1,125
YALDEI SHLUCHEI HAREBBE SPECIAL NEEDS ORGANIZATION$1,100
MY JUDAISM INC$950
CHABAD GREATER HILTON HEAD$500
CHABAD YOUNG PROFESSIONALS$495
FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON$400
CHABAD OF TRIBECA$393
CHEDER LUBAVITCH ARIZONA$350

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $55) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sephardic College for Rabbinic and

The organization's primary purpose is to train sephardic jewish individuals to become rabbis and teachers and to disseminate judaic and talmudic teachings.

Religion

American Friends Yeshiva Reishit Chochma

Support of Yeshiva Reishit Chochmah

Unclassified

American Friends of Kollel Beis Hillel

Support of religious activities in Ramat Beit Shemesh, Israel

Religion

The Chabira Inc

To provide financial support to institutions of religious education of the orthodox jewish faith.

Philanthropy

American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva

Support of religious schools in Israel

International

Fund for Jewish Education Inc

Philanthropy

University of Judaism Foundation

—

Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Sherit Isroel

—

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center.it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

American Friends of Heichal

The funding of heichal yerushalayim yeshiva(religious shcool) to facilitate and promote judaic studies.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Committee for Furtherance of and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Chabad of Hebron Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/20

the rest of the field

12%

12,572/108,486

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/8

Grantees still filing

8/8

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$15,474Religion$3,900International$1,420Philanthropy$1,100Education$350Human Services$55

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY26.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Hp Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MP FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JEM FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 822907705 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on JEM FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mp Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mp Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MP FOUNDATION INC

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mp Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

MP FOUNDATION INC

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mp Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph