Skip to content
Moulton Harold E Scholarship Fund 18362340 at a glance

· Private foundation

Moulton Harold E Scholarship Fund 18362340

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$177k
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$405k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTICA COLLEGE$6,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$5,000
DAEMEN COLLEGE$3,000
ALFRED STATE COLLEGE$3,000
Fredonia State University of NY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRAND CANYON: $1k → 11%SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY: $8k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $6k → 11%PennWest University: $3k → 12%MANSFIELD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%EDINBORO UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%FINGER LAKES COMMUNITY: $3k → 10%CORNING COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 13%DAEMEN COLLEGE: $3k → 13%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 14%NIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%KEUKA COLLEGE: $3k → 15%UTICA COLLEGE: $6k → 16%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $14k → 16%BARNARD COLLEGE: $5k → 17%Fredonia State University of NY: $3k → 18%ALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 19%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 21%SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%PennWest University: $3k → 12%DAEMEN COLLEGE: $2k → 13%KEUKA COLLEGE: $2k → 15%UTICA COLLEGE: $4k → 16%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 16%BARNARD COLLEGE: $3k → 17%Fredonia State University of NY: $3k → 18%ALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $3k → 19%SUNY AT BUFFALO: $8k → 13%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 16%SUNY AT FREDONIA: $1k → 18%ALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $1k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $6k → 13%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 16%SUNY FREDONIA: $1k → 18%SUNY AT BUFFALO: $5k → 13%SUNY AT BUFFALO: $3k → 13%SUNY AT BUFFALO: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 14 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$140k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+2%

Still filing today

36%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KEUKA COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +6%
  • DU
    DAEMEN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2026 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2025 · $6k · revenue 0%
  • EU
    EDINBORO UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Institute & University

Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…

—
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Alfred University

Alfred University's mission is helping students realize their purpose. People living a life of purpose enjoy longer and happier lives. Alfred University promotes its mission through three core strengths - Intersections, Mentorship, and…

Education
5
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Cumberland University

The mission of cumberland university is to provide a personalized, high-quality, value-based educational experience that equips learners to lead, serve, and excel in an ever-evolving world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Niagara University; the most unlike its peers is Corning Community College Development Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $32,750 · OtherJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGESLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY: $23,250 · OtherSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITYSUNY AT BUFFALO: $16,500 · OtherSUNY AT BUFFALOALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $9,500 · OtherALFRED STATE COLLEGEEDINBORO UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherGRANTS IN US-GOVERNMENTS-990: $5,500 · OtherFredonia State University of NY: $5,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $5,500 · OtherSUNY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY AT ALFRED: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $18,500 · Other+9 moreUTICA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationUTICA UNIVERSITYBARNARD COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGEKEUKA COLLEGE: $6,500 · EducationKEUKA COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHRochester Institute of Technology: $5,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technolo…DAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationDAEMEN UNIVERSITYCornell University: $4,500 · EducationCornell UniversityNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · Education
Other$128,000Education$48,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTICA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEUKA COLLEGE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNIAGARA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTICA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KEUKA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds DAEMEN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORNING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jessie H Baker Educat…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jessie H Baker Educational FundNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jessie H Baker Educational Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moulton Harold E Scholarship Fund 18362340 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moulton Harold E Scholarship Fund 18362340. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moulton Harold E Scholarship Fund 18362340’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home