Skip to content

· Private foundation

Motor Castings Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$86kHealth$77kRecreation & Sports$45kPhilanthropy$27kYouth Development$26kHuman Services$23kCrime & Legal$20kInternational$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$335k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AURORA HEALTHCARE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$5,000
WISCONSIN WORLD AFFAIRS SEMINAR$5,000
UW-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WEST ALLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT$2,500
THE DOMINICAN CENTER$1,000
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$1,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCATION$1,000
SOJOURNER'S TRUTH HOUSE$1,000
FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS$500
FEF GEORGE BARKER SCHOLARSHIP$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $500 → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 17%FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Motor Castings Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Motor Castings Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$292k · 28 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$292k
$6k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +84%
  • HI
    HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MD
    MELINA DIAMOND CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NS
    NATIONAL SARCOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
2
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
3
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
4
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
5
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
6
Dominican University

Dominican University provides instruction to students seeking an Associates, Undergraduate or Graduate degree (some doctorate and certificates), and administers all of its programs without discrimination of race, color, gender, religion,…

Education
7
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
8
Marian University

To be a great catholic university dedicated to excellence in learning, achieved by teaching, research, & scholarly activities in franciscan & liberal arts tradition.

Education
9
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
10
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
11
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
12
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Diocese of Madison; the most unlike its peers is Hope Ignites Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AURORA HEALTHCARE: $71,500 · OtherAURORA HEALTHCAREIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST ALLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT: $23,500 · OtherWEST ALLIS POLICE DEPARTMENTUNITED WAY: $15,000 · OtherUNITED WAYIndividual grant recipient: $12,300 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · Other+23 more: $82,250 · Other+23 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $45,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dam…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $8,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $4,750 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Health
Other$258,550Education$71,000Human Services$12,750Arts & Culture$6,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC: $4,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Motor Castings Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Motor Castings Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Motor Castings Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Motor Castings Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Motor Castings’ filings →

    More from the funding graph