Skip to content
Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center

To provide the community with a full range of comprehensive health care services without regard to race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay.

$690k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$33MPhilanthropy$496kCommunity Improvement$480kEducation$329kReligion$203kFood & Nutrition$155kArts & Culture$138kRecreation & Sports$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 29 grants below total $537,148, the rows itemized in this filing. The $689,832 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $152,684 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $353k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$841M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Diocese of Tyler$62,000
United Way of Smith County$53,200
Cancer Foundation for Life Inc$45,000
Greenberg Smoked Turkeys Inc$41,800
Bethesda Health Clinic$40,000
Lindale ISD$35,000
Mount Pleasant ISD Foundation$25,000
All Saints Episcopal School$20,000
Green Acres Baptist Church$20,000
Junior League of Tyler Inc$18,000
People Attempting To Help$16,000
Cathedral of Immaculate Conception$15,000
East Texas Veterans Community Council$14,198
Alzheimers Alliance of Northeast Texas$12,500
Women's Fund$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%People Attempting To Help: $16k → 12%ST PAUL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32M · 41 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
24

Total granted

$32M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+13%

Still filing today

68%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SERVICE ORGANIZATION OF THE PINEY WOODS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14M · revenue +211%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $443k · revenue +2%
  • TJ
    THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TYLER INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $315k · revenue +110% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    BOWIE COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.4M
  • CH
    Christus Hopkins Health Alliancegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +136%
  • CM
    CSFN MISSION & MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

—
2
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
4
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
—
5
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Texas Economic Development Corporation

The texas economic development corporation is an independently funded and operated 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization responsible for marketing and promoting texas as a premier business location.

Community Improvement
8
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

—
10
Texas Chamber of Commerce Executives

To enhance the professional growth of chamber professionals.

—
11
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
12
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Tyler Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
32/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SERVICE ORGANIZATION OF NORTH & EAST TEXAS: $14,910,450 · OtherSERVICE ORGANIZATION OF NORTH & EAST TEXASSERVICE ORGANIZATION OF THE PINEY WOODS: $14,167,250 · OtherSERVICE ORGANIZATION OF THE PINEY WOODSBOWIE COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $1,448,265 · Other+37 more: $2,501,735 · Other+37 moreKOURAGE HEALTH INC: $330,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $261,400 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $194,300 · HealthCHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC TEXAS: $67,119 · HealthBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC: $52,500 · Health+3 more: $59,500 · HealthUNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY: $442,534 · PhilanthropyCATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE OF TYLER: $50,503 · PhilanthropyWOMENS FUND OF SMITH COUNTY: $33,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TYLER INC: $315,305 · Community ImprovementTYLER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $70,000 · Community ImprovementLINDALE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $28,030 · Community ImprovementLEADERSHIP TYLER INC: $17,600 · Community ImprovementTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationWhitehouse Isd Education Foundation: $40,000 · EducationLINDALE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationMT PLEASANT ISD SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $18,500 · EducationTYLER AREA P-16 COUNCIL DBA TYLER AREA BUSINESS EDUCATION COUNC: $15,000 · EducationPROMISE ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationTYLER HISPANIC BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationEDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION OF EAST TEXAS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureEAST TEXAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC: $29,000 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY PLACE INC DBA THE DISCOVERY SCIENCE PLACE INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureLONDON MUSEUM: $8,500 · Arts & CultureWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitEAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V: $19,198 · Public BenefitSPORTYLER: $15,700 · Public BenefitLeadership Women Inc: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$33,027,700Health$964,819Philanthropy$531,537Community Improvement$430,935Education$198,500Arts & Culture$76,500Public Benefit$64,898

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSERVICE ORGANIZATION OF THE PINEY WOODS: $14,167,250 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetChristus Hopkins Health Alliance: $1,020,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION: $485,705 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY: $442,534 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetKOURAGE HEALTH INC: $330,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TYLER INC: $315,305 over 6y, 31% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $261,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $194,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTYLER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC TEXAS: $67,119 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF NORTHEAST TEXAS dba ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF SMITH COUNTY: $56,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTexas Rose Festival Association: $56,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTYLER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $54,930 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC: $52,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE OF TYLER: $50,503 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWhitehouse Isd Education Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetLINDALE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetWOMENS FUND OF SMITH COUNTY: $33,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL: $31,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION OF EAST TEXAS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAST TEXAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC: $29,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLINDALE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $28,030 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMT PLEASANT ISD SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHRISTUS ST PATRICK FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V: $19,198 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLEADERSHIP TYLER INC: $17,600 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTHCARE INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP: $16,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPORTYLER: $15,700 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTYLER AREA P-16 COUNCIL DBA TYLER AREA BUSINESS EDUCATION COUNC: $15,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetChildren are a Gift Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetPROMISE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTYLER HISPANIC BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetWomens Symphony League of Tyler Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetLONDON MUSEUM: $8,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetHENDERSON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $5,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Women Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communitie…Ben and Maytee Fisch …The Rogers FoundationByers Family Foundati…Bob L Herd FoundationRiter Family Foundati…The Louis and Peaches…Hibbs Family Foundati…A S Genecov FoundationWomens Fund of Smith …Christus-Trinity Moth…James I Perkins Famil…
East Texas Communities FoundationTX57.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · Byers Family Foundation · Bob L Herd Foundation · Riter Family Foundation · The Louis and Peaches Owen Family Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · A S Genecov Foundation · Womens Fund of Smith County · Christus-Trinity Mother Frances Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home