Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moss Adams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$391k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.6MPhilanthropy$3.4MYouth Development$314kPublic Safety & Disaster$181kCivil Rights$154kEnvironment$143kMembership Benefit$126kInternational$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $131k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $309k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $391k
$2,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$390,783
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$150,050
OCEAN BLUE PROJECT$50,000
WILD FARM ALLIANCE$35,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$35,000
CALIFORNIA POLYTECH STATE UNIVERSITY$33,334
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE$28,000
THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION$25,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON$25,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO$20,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
EVERYBODY SOLAR$15,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$12,725
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $35k → 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $10k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 10%SAFE HOUSE: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 83 repeat orgs$939k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

83 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
182

Total granted

$4.1M
$735k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+14%

Still filing today

41%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $152k · revenue +42%
  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $119k · revenue +182%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHICO
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • XS
    XERCES SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
7
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
12
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Lucstrong Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 314 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/97
Grantees still filing
66/97
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $442,995 · OtherCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Associat…BETA ALPHA PSI: $266,173 · OtherBETA ALPHA PSIWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $248,550 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE: $198,980 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGECALIFORNIA POLYTECH STATE UNIVERSITY: $147,776 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $147,500 · OtherPROJECT RUN WITH IT: $123,165 · Other+145 more: $2,097,196 · Other+145 moreAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,293,277 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,054,388 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $151,640 · EducationCORPORATION …UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $119,403 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $99,950 · EducationPRESIDENT-BO…WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $90,463 · EducationWHITWORTH UN…FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $64,885 · EducationFOUNDATION F…Oregon State University Foundation: $55,000 · EducationOregon State…UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $36,996 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $33,800 · Education+24 more: $281,567 · Education+24 moreTHE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION: $150,000 · Civil RightsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $60,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION: $14,010 · HealthTHE LUCSTRONG FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthSHASTA COUNTY CHEMICAL PEOPLE: $10,000 · HealthEmpower Youth Network: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $10,000 · HealthJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $52,500 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECT: $10,000 · International
Other$3,672,335Philanthropy$3,367,665Education$933,704Civil Rights$150,000Human Services$72,500Health$64,010International$62,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,293,277 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $1,054,388 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $442,995 over 4y, 18% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $151,640 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION: $150,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $119,403 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $99,950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $90,463 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $64,885 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $52,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $36,996 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWild Farm Alliance: $35,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $33,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $30,025 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $27,045 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $22,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACCOUNTING CAREER AWARENESS PROGRAM: $21,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION: $14,010 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $11,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $11,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OSCPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMcKenzie River Trust: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOCOON HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget10000 DEGREES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Helpline: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHASTA COUNTY CHEMICAL PEOPLE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEmpower Youth Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CONTINUOUS CHARITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds XERCES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wild Farm Alliance ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Credit Unions in the State of WashingtonWA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Ernst & Young Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Northrop Grumman Foundation · Pemco Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · Deloitte Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moss Adams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moss Adams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • McKenzie River Trust: 8% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 2% of income from government
  • Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
  • University of Portland: 1% of income from government
  • Southern Oregon University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moss Adams Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Moss Adams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 314 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moss Adams’ filings →

More from the funding graph