Skip to content

· Public charity

Moshchainy

We promote foster and advance the health, welfare and well-being of the impoverished and needy individuals by providing them with food, living essentials and financial aid.

$2.2M
Granted FY2022
44
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 44 grants below total $1,504,264, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,182,367 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $678,103 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k13 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $479k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $433k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Congregation Mayim Chayim Inc$500,000
Congregation Ezer L Yehudah Inc$113,000
Zera Kodesh Dshendishov$93,960
Congregation Ahavas Tzdokah Vchesed Inc$76,000
Kolel Asike Shmatasa Toras Chesed$50,000
Cong Tzizamen Inc$50,000
American Friends Of Polnooer$50,000
Zichron Menachem Inc$47,470
Cong Beear Avrohom Dslonim$40,657
Yam Hachesed Vhatorah$40,000
Ichai Foundation Inc$35,000
Zimrah Vuchesed Inc$30,000
Bais Chuna$28,000
American Friends of Sanhedria Jerusalem$25,000
Congregation Ahavas Yisroel$24,207
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Chasdei Yona Meir Inc: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $359k on the FY2022 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$349k · 97% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$10k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
4
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Chasdei Ish Foundation
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yad Eliezer-Bei Shemesh

Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.

Philanthropy
7
Zechut Avot Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Israel Charitable Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Yeshaya Foundation
—
11
Chasudim Foundation
—
12
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chayim V Chesed; the most unlike its peers is Ichai Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION MAYIM CHAYIM INC: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MAYIM CHAYIM INCCONGREGATION EZER L YEHUDAH INC: $113,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EZER L YEHUDAH INCZera Kodesh Dshendishov: $93,960 · OtherZera Kodesh DshendishovCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $76,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCKOLEL ASIKE SHMATASA: $50,000 · OtherCONG TZIZAMEN INC: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLNOOER INST INC: $50,000 · OtherZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $47,470 · Other+26 more: $329,034 · Other+26 moreYam Hachesed Vhatorah: $40,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC: $25,000 · ReligionAYZER LALIYA INC: $16,800 · ReligionCHAYIM V CHESED: $15,000 · ReligionICHAI FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyZIMRAH VUCHESED INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyImanu: $6,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI YONA MEIR: $10,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC: $10,000 · InternationalVYAZREIM INC: $6,500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,309,464Religion$96,800Philanthropy$71,000Human Services$10,500International$10,000Public Benefit$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYam Hachesed Vhatorah: $40,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetICHAI FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetZIMRAH VUCHESED INC: $30,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetAYZER LALIYA INC: $16,800 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHASDEI YONA MEIR: $10,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImanu: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLNOOER INST INC ↗
  • Who funds Yam Hachesed Vhatorah ↗
  • Who funds ICHAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZIMRAH VUCHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AYZER LALIYA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI YONA MEIR ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC ↗
  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY55× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Vyazreim Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Yaazoru Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Moshe Eichler Fund Inc · Hf Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moshchainy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moshchainy. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moshchainy?

    Find your warmest path to Moshchainy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moshchainy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph