· Public charity
Moshchainy
We promote foster and advance the health, welfare and well-being of the impoverished and needy individuals by providing them with food, living essentials and financial aid.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 44 grants below total $1,504,264 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,182,367 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $678,103 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k13 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $479k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $433k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Congregation Mayim Chayim Inc | $500,000 |
| Congregation Ezer L Yehudah Inc | $113,000 |
| Zera Kodesh Dshendishov | $93,960 |
| Congregation Ahavas Tzdokah Vchesed Inc | $76,000 |
| Kolel Asike Shmatasa Toras Chesed | $50,000 |
| Cong Tzizamen Inc | $50,000 |
| American Friends Of Polnooer | $50,000 |
| Zichron Menachem Inc | $47,470 |
| Cong Beear Avrohom Dslonim | $40,657 |
| Yam Hachesed Vhatorah | $40,000 |
| Ichai Foundation Inc | $35,000 |
| Zimrah Vuchesed Inc | $30,000 |
| Bais Chuna | $28,000 |
| American Friends of Sanhedria Jerusalem | $25,000 |
| Congregation Ahavas Yisroel | $24,207 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $359k on the FY2022 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CHARITABLE
Stated purpose: CHARITABLE
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chayim V Chesed and the most unlike its peers is Ichai Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF POLNOOER INST INC ↗
- Who funds Yam Hachesed Vhatorah ↗
- Who funds ICHAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ZIMRAH VUCHESED INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds AYZER LALIYA INC ↗
- Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
- Who funds CHASDEI YONA MEIR ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANATEVKA INC ↗
- Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Vyazreim Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Yaazoru Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Moshe Eichler Fund Inc · Hf Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moshchainy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Moshchainy?
Find your warmest path to Moshchainy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.