Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mosey Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$82kEducation$76kArts & Culture$45kAnimals$7kPhilanthropy$6kReligion$6kCrime & Legal$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$588k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAEMEN COLLEGE$5,000
FANTASTIC FRIENDS OF WNY$3,950
SHAKESPERRE$3,000
BUFFALO ZOO$3,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
CANISIUS COLLEGE$3,000
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$250
TIDEWELL FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE BUFFALO: $100 → 13%FANTASTIC FRIENDS OF WNY: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$195k · 9 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$195k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+25%

Still filing today

44%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $81k
  • DU
    DAEMEN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +24%
  • SP
    SHEAS PERFORMING ART CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $26k

Funded once

  • SP
    SHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • CC
    CHUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University At Buffalo Neurosurgery Inc

University at buffalo neurosurgery, inc. is an academic neurosurgical group committed to excellence in patient care, research, and education. our mission is to develop and implement sound strategies that focus on quality medical services,…

Health
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
University Psychiatric Practice Inc

The corporation assists the state university of new york at buffalo department of psychiatry in the delivery of health care, recruitment and retention of teaching physicians, and support of research in the field of psychiatry.

Health
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Buffalo Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fantastic Friends of Wny Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $80,500 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONSHEAS PERFORMING ART CENTER — $26,250 · OtherSHEAS PERFORMING ART CENTERTHE GOW SCHOOL — $20,400 · OtherTHE GOW SCHOOLSHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $12,000 · OtherSHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+18 more — $31,152 · Other+18 moreDAEMEN UNIVERSITY — $43,500 · EducationDAEMEN UNIVERSITYCANISIUS UNIVERSITY — $10,200 · EducationCANISIUS UNIVERSITYZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC — $6,500 · AnimalsFANTASTIC FRIENDS OF WNY INC — $3,950 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 · HealthTIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC — $200 · Health
Other$181,802Education$53,700Animals$6,500Human Services$4,050Health$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDAEMEN UNIVERSITY — $43,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOW SCHOOL — $20,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANISIUS UNIVERSITY — $10,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFANTASTIC FRIENDS OF WNY INC — $3,950 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE BUFFALO INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAEMEN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE GOW SCHOOL
  • Who funds CANISIUS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC
  • Who funds FANTASTIC FRIENDS OF WNY INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds TIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE BUFFALO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Saperston Family Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mosey Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph