Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moscone Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$278kEducation$270kPhilanthropy$57kHuman Services$55kReligion$32kEnvironment$30kYouth Development$13kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING AND LEARNING ENRICHMENT$39,105
CAMP CASEY$15,000
DUTTON FARMS$14,500
KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$10,576
EVEREST ACADEMY$10,000
BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST$5,000
HOLY NAME$4,500
ROSE HILL FOUNDATION$2,400
GLOBAL HEALTH CHARITIES$2,000
DYNAMI FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
INTEGRITY INTERNATIONAL$800
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$515
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $515 → 14%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $100 → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%CAMP CASEY: $15k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $11k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $8k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $15k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $10k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $10k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $6k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $3k → 8%DUTTON FARMS: $700 → 8%CAMP CASEY: $11k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
UT
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$647k · 20 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
39

Total granted

$647k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+83%

Still filing today

45%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAMP CASEY CORPORATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +48%
  • DF
    DUTTON FARM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $44k · revenue +269%
  • LT
    LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2021 · $22k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • NW
    NAPLES WINTER & WINE FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • LL
    LIVING LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hurley Foundation

Our primary purpose is to operate for the advancement of medical sciences, education, medical care, and the delivery thereof, for the benefit of the residents of the greater metropolitan flint area and for the distribution of its funds to…

Civil Rights
2
Cdu Foundation

The purpose of this corporation is to perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of charles r. drew university of medicine and science (cdu), a california nonprofit public benefit corporation. this…

Education
3
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
4
Dch Foundation Inc

To provide funds to enhance the medical facilities for the DCH Health System with a focus on DCH Regional Medical Center and Northport Medical Center.

Education
5
Healthcare for the Homeless-Houston

Non-profit corporation providing healthcare to the homeless.

Human Services
6
Foundation for University Hospital a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The foundation for university hospital was formed in 2014 for the exclusive purpose of supporting the operations of university hospital and the hospital's public mission to provide a comprehensive healthcare program and healthcare services…

Health
7
Digestive Disease Research Foundation

Conduct and support clinical medical research in the field of gastroenterology.

Health
8
Luminis Health Research Institute Inc (Fka Anne Arundel Research Institute)

Luminis health research institute, inc. is dedicated to providing quality support to luminis health anne arundel medical center, inc. ("lhaamc") physicians in conducting human subjects research. our research staff is qualified by training…

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
The H Foundation

The h foundation was established to raise funds for basic science cancer research, supporting the early, novel ideas that may lead research teams to obtain additional grants and advancements in the fight against cancer.

Health
11
Davis Health System Foundation Inc

We care for life.

Philanthropy
12
Alcides E Rosaura Diniz Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rose Hill Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lucas Cup Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $172,576 · OtherKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTELIVING AND LEARNING ENRICHMENT: $151,605 · OtherLIVING AND LEARNING ENRICHMENTOAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITYCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $31,600 · OtherWIND SOAR MINISTRIES: $30,000 · Other+42 more: $108,727 · Other+42 moreCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $50,500 · Human ServicesCAMP CASEY CO…DUTTON FARM: $44,300 · Human ServicesDUTTON FARM+2 more: $865 · Human ServicesLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $15,400 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyLUCAS CUP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC: $18,500 · Youth DevelopmentDYNAMI FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 · HealthHealth Unit on Davison Avenue: $5,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $535 · HealthINTEGRITY INTERNATIONAL: $800 · Religion
Other$619,508Human Services$95,665Education$22,500Philanthropy$19,400Youth Development$18,500Health$16,035Religion$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $50,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetDUTTON FARM: $44,300 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC: $18,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $15,400 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetDYNAMI FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Unit on Davison Avenue: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDERS FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUCAS CUP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTEGRITY INTERNATIONAL: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $765 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $535 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PAUL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP CASEY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DUTTON FARM ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSE HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DYNAMI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Health Unit on Davison Avenue ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDERS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCAS CUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRITY INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moscone Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moscone Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moscone Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Moscone Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moscone Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph