Skip to content
Moscoe Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Moscoe Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$503kReligion$173kHuman Services$66kArts & Culture$34kYouth Development$31kHealth$19kInternational$13kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$50,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL FUNDS$28,019
HERZL CAMP$25,000
ASPEN THEATRE$10,000
BEST BUDDIES$5,145
ASPEN HOPE CENTER$5,000
SHOLOM FOUNDATION$3,600
MIDDLE EAST (ME24)$1,030
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE$726
FIFE HIGH SCHOOL$100
INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON$24
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAD TOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $130 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $25 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $24 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $23 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $22 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $22 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $20 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $300 → 11%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $20 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $300 → 11%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $20 → 14%INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON: $20 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $726 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $525 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $490 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $475 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $440 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $440 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $330 → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $50 → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $40 → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $10 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 10 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
37

Total granted

$414k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+12%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SHOLOM FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +204%
  • AH
    ASPEN HOPE CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +25%
  • S
    SUMMIT54
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID ADOM USA
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • BF
    Binyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SO
    SAVE OSWIT CANYON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +408%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
4
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
8
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
9
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL FUNDS: $160,444 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL FUNDSJEWISH FEDERATION: $150,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONASPEN THEATRE: $17,500 · Other+34 more: $77,005 · Other+34 moreMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $337,535 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATIONTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $15,208 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropySHOLOM FOUNDATION: $55,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $4,026 · Human Services+2 more: $326 · Human ServicesHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $25 · Recreation & SportsBinyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel: $10,200 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1,980 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalASPEN HOPE CENTER: $11,113 · Health+4 more: $435 · HealthSAVE OSWIT CANYON INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$404,949Philanthropy$353,743Human Services$59,852Recreation & Sports$25,025International$12,280Health$11,548Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $337,535 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $55,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $15,208 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASPEN HOPE CENTER: $11,113 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBinyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel: $10,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAVE OSWIT CANYON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUMMIT54: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJ-HAP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $4,026 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $1,980 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEGIVEASHARE Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC: $315 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF EVANSTON INC: $196 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc: $130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE FRIENDS: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIDNEY CANCER ASSOCIATION: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Binyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OSWIT CANYON INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT54 ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds J-HAP INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WEGIVEASHARE Inc ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert and Susan Diam…Mike & Linda Fiterman…Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Minneapolis Found…Alex G & Mollie Tanke…Mightycause Charitabl…Oren and Sharron Stei…Ronald Fingerhut Fami…Baratz Family Foundat…Marshall & Elaine Sie…Beryl and Florence Mi…Fingerhut Family Foun…
Robert and Susan Diamond FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert and Susan Diamond Foundation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Oren and Sharron Steinfeldt Foundation · Ronald Fingerhut Family Foundation · Baratz Family Foundation Inc · Marshall & Elaine Siegel Foundation · Beryl and Florence Miller Family Foundation · Fingerhut Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moscoe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moscoe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moscoe Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Moscoe Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moscoe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home