Skip to content
Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$117kHuman Services$70kHousing & Shelter$57kReligion$44kEnvironment$5kPhilanthropy$4kEducation$1kRecreation & Sports$58
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,625
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE RENEWED INTERNATIONAL$8,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIVE POWER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%ITALIAN MINISTRIES USA: $20k → 15%BEGENEROUS INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 6 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
21

Total granted

$231k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-42%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    Hope Renewed International
    8× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue -60%
  • OO
    OTHERS OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue -94%
  • IR
    INDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $39k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • IM
    ITALIAN MINISTRIES USA
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -8%
  • MF
    MISSION FIREFLY LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -49%
  • TS
    THE SONDER PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
2
Hope Here International Ministries Inc

Aid to poverty stricken areas in the u.s. and abroad.

International
3
Hope Fulfilled International

Our Mission is to minister the love of Jesus Christ to the Least, the Last and the Lost of the world through the provision of assistance in the areas of disaster relief, grief counseling, Christian guidance, Christian education, emergency…

Religion
4
Impact of Hope International

Impact of hope international is a nonprofit christian ministry dedicated to serving the world's neediest people. we provide the assistance needed to rebuild lives impacted by economic depression or religious persecution. first, we meet…

International
5
Hope and Help International

Hope and help international is a faith-based evangelical ministry, committed to serving impoverished people in south asia by meeting both spiritual and humanitarian needs.

Religion
6
Orphans Hope International
—
7
Hope in the Harvest Missions

The organization's mission is to seek to cultivate christ's hope in underdeveloped and impoverished areas of the world through agricultural and personal transformation.

International
8
Haiti Hope Mission Inc

To bring the message of jesus to haiti

Religion
9
Interhope Inc

To assist in the rescue and care of abandoned and orphaned children in the developing world and to advocate for them by creating awareness of their plight within Christian churches.

Religion
10
Hope Ministries for Haiti Inc
—
11
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
12
New Hope Childrens Ministries

The organization provides housing medical care education and loving support for homeless children in peru. the home is located in arequipa peru. the organization houses approximately 50 children and assists children no longer residing at…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission of Hope Inc Mission of Hope Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Sonder Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTHERS OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $39,913 · OtherOTHERS OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INCINDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $39,390 · OtherINDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INCIndividual grant recipient: $38,396 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISSION FIREFLY LLC: $8,000 · OtherMISSION FIREFLY LLCST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5,000 · Other+13 more: $15,342 · Other+13 moreHope Renewed International: $76,958 · InternationalHope Renewed InternationalTHE SONDER PROJECT INC: $5,000 · InternationalTHE SONDER PROJECT INCITALIAN MINISTRIES USA: $20,224 · Human ServicesITALIAN MI…GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesGIVEPOWER …BEGENEROUS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBEGENEROUS…Hope for the World Foundation Inc: $19,290 · ReligionMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $3,000 · ReligionOPPORTUNITY PLACE INC: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Philanthropy
Other$146,041International$81,958Human Services$27,224Religion$22,290Housing & Shelter$17,000Philanthropy$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHope Renewed International: $76,958 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetOTHERS OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $39,913 over 2y, 11% of budgetINDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $39,390 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetITALIAN MINISTRIES USA: $20,224 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHope for the World Foundation Inc: $19,290 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetOPPORTUNITY PLACE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMISSION FIREFLY LLC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SONDER PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGIVEPOWER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $4,063 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEGENEROUS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCARE TALLAHASSEE INC: $400 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hope Renewed International ↗
  • Who funds OTHERS OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIA RURAL EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds ITALIAN MINISTRIES USA ↗
  • Who funds Hope for the World Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FIREFLY LLC ↗
  • Who funds THE SONDER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds BEGENEROUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE TALLAHASSEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable I…Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I?

    Find your warmest path to Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mortgage Professionals Providing Hope I’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home