Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morse Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$8k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of Morse Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Morse Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $42k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
3
’18
3
’19
3
’20
4
’21
5
’22
4
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$581kArts & Culture$105kHuman Services$76kEducation$37kHousing & Shelter$36kReligion$29kAnimals$12kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$8,000
HOME FOR CHILDREN$6,000
EL BUEN SAMARITANO EPISCOPAL MISSION$5,271
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD$5,000
FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES$5,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$5,000
MOBILE LOAVES AND FISHES$4,000
AUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,000
HOSPICE AUSTIN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 67% of Morse Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 32%.

Morse Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 9 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$289k
$2k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHealthEducationReligionAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue +27%
  • FC
    FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +99%
  • TS
    THE SETTLEMENT CLUB
    6× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • PB
    PHI BETA KAPPA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF GREATER AUSTIN
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
2
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
3
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
4
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
A Faithful Presence

A faithful presence afp is an organization that provides holistic spiritual care, community building, and trauma-informed advocacy for our formerly homeless neighbors while training other communities to do the same.

Religion
7
Austin City Lutherans

Address food and housing insecurity for Austin-area low income families.

Religion
8
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
9
Hospice Austin Fund

The fund is a type 1 supporting organization of hospice austin. assets of the fund are used for maintenance, support, and operations of hospice austin programs.

—
10
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
11
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
12
Caritas of Austin

Caritas of austin provides a home and tailored services to prevent and end homelessness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Austin; the most unlike its peers is El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $581,404 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMAUSTIN CIVIL WAR ROUND TABLE: $74,710 · OtherAUSTIN CIVIL WAR ROUND …THE SALVATION ARMY: $43,776 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $28,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXASEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $23,500 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE…+3 more: $13,271 · Other+3 moreAUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $37,351 · EducationFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $36,001 · Housing & ShelterTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $26,622 · HealthAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $12,407 · AnimalsMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $6,279 · ReligionHOSPICE AUSTIN: $2,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$581,404Other$183,257Education$37,351Housing & Shelter$36,001Health$26,622Animals$12,407Religion$6,279Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $581,404 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $37,351 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $36,001 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $26,622 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $12,407 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $6,279 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEl Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission: $5,271 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SETTLEMENT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Greater AustinTX13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Greater Austin · Austin Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morse Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morse Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morse Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph