Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morris and Helen Silver Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$111kArts & Culture$101kCrime & Legal$20kEducation$6kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$3kRecreation & Sports$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,414
Individual grant recipient$1,500
HGRM$1,000
CRYSTAL PEAKS YOUTH RANCH$500
GRIZZLY RODEO ASSOCIATION$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WATSON'S CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$150k · 8 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$150k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

38%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN BALLET THEATRE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +35%
  • H
    HGRM
    4× · 2017–2023 · $34k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2021 · $10k

Funded once

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +338%
  • TL
    The LifeGuard Group Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -69%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Rocky Mountain Horse Foundation
Science & Tech
3
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Montana Pro Rodeo Hall and Wall of Fame

To honor montana professional rodeo cowboys and cowgirls who exemplify montana western heritage.

Arts & Culture
6
The Michael Murphey Western Institute in
Arts & Culture
7
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
8
Wind River Valley Artist Guild
—
9
Rocky Mountain Emmy Foundation
—
10
Windwalker Ridge Mustang Sanctuary Inc

Currently housing and caring for 84 displaced wild mustang horses

Animals
11
Colt Family Foundation Montana
Philanthropy
12
Four Rings Montana Family Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Ballet Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $100,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKI…SUMMIT FOR PARKINSONS: $9,000 · HealthSUMMIT FOR PARKINSONSHGRM: $34,075 · OtherHGRMIndividual grant recipient: $10,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIG SKY DOC FILM FESTIVAL: $10,000 · OtherBIG SKY DOC FILM FESTIVALUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $8,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MONTANAIndividual grant recipient: $4,900 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGE: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,414 · Other+8 more: $7,950 · Other+8 moreROCKY MOUNTAIN BALLET THEATRE: $79,875 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN BALLET THEATRETHE EQUUS PROJECTS INC DANCING WITH HORSES: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EQUUS PROJECTS INC DANCING W…+1 more: $2,750 · Arts & CultureThe LifeGuard Group Inc: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $500 · Crime & LegalWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $2,480 · Human ServicesMISSOULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,850 · Community ImprovementRIVER PINES HORSE SANCTUARY: $500 · AnimalsGrizzly Rodeo Association: $150 · Education
Health$109,000Other$93,539Arts & Culture$90,625Crime & Legal$20,500Human Services$2,480Community Improvement$1,850Animals$500Education$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BALLET THEATRE: $79,875 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetThe LifeGuard Group Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE EQUUS PROJECTS INC DANCING WITH HORSES: $8,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetMISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $2,480 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrizzly Rodeo Association: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN BALLET THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds The LifeGuard Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT FOR PARKINSONS ↗
  • Who funds THE EQUUS PROJECTS INC DANCING WITH HORSES ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVER PINES HORSE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co ↗
  • Who funds Grizzly Rodeo Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher FoundationMT17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morris and Helen Silver Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morris and Helen Silver Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Morris and Helen Silver Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Morris and Helen Silver Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morris and Helen Silver’s filings →

    More from the funding graph