Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Morillon Family Foundation

$12k
Granted FY2020
20
Grants FY2020
10
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$150
Median grant
10
States reached
$794
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Faustina Catholic Church$5,800
VHL Family Alliance$1,000
MaryKnoll Fathers & Brothers$1,000
Brookwood Community$1,000
Archdiocese of Galveston Houston$800
Catholic Relief Services$350
Houston Food Bank$350
Wounded Warrior Project$230
St Anne De Beaupre$150
Central Assoc of the Miraculous Medal$150
Individual grant recipient$132
Pregancy Resource Medical Center$120
Judicial Watch$100
Crime Stoppers of Houston Inc$100
VFW$100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $230) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $230 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
MO
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Faustina Catholic Church — $5,800 · OtherSt Faustina Catholic ChurchMaryKnoll Fathers & Brothers — $1,000 · OtherMaryKnoll Fathers & BrothersVHL Family Alliance — $1,000 · OtherVHL Family AllianceArchdiocese of Galveston Houston — $800 · OtherArchdiocese of Galveston HoustonCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $350 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank — $350 · Other+10 more — $952 · Other+10 moreThe Brookwood Community Inc — $1,000 · EducationThe Brook…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $230 · Human ServicesTHE 100 CLUB INC — $100 · Crime & LegalJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $100 · Public Benefit
Other$10,252Education$1,000Human Services$230Crime & Legal$100Public Benefit$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPregnancy Resource Medical Center — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrime Stoppers of Houston Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Medical Center
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC
  • Who funds Crime Stoppers of Houston Inc
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morillon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph