· Private foundation
Moriarty Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of MORIARTY FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $225k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE | $100,000 |
| PROJECT LIFT | $25,000 |
| MAINE MEDICAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| OLYMPIA SNOWE WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| CODMAN ACADEMY CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN MAINE | $15,000 |
| MAINE GUN SAFETY COALITION FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - THE WHARTON SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| PINE STREET INN | $10,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| PATIENT ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FOCUSMAINE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPROJECT LIFT INC7× · 2019–2025 · $195k · revenue +281%
- MMaineHealth6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +64%
PINE STREET INN INC6× · 2019–2025 · $93k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- HGHARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2019 · $25k
- UUSMone grant, 2020 · $20k
- CCCLEVELAND CLINICone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
Penobscot Bay Medical Center (PBMC) is an acute care hospital that offers inpatient and outpatient care, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative services, patient and community education, and a full range of specialty services through…
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Youth Making a Difference. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds Olympia Snowe Women's Leadership Institute ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A STRONG MAINE ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds WEX CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PATIENT ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine ↗
- Who funds SHROPSHIRE MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON ↗
- Who funds MAINE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITANS INC ↗
- Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · The Morgridge Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moriarty Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc — 40% of income from government
- Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- United Way of Martin County Inc — 4% of income from government
- Florida Oceanographic Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Animal Rescue League of Boston — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.