Skip to content
Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc

Our vision at Monument Health Rapid City Hospital is to be one team, to listen, to be inclusive, and to show we care.

$441k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.0MEducation$933kCommunity Improvement$553kArts & Culture$150kPublic Benefit$77kRecreation & Sports$74kHuman Services$73kHealth$68kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $304k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Elevate Rapid City$153,500
Historic Rapid City$150,000
Central States Fair Inc$20,000
Black Hills State University Foundation$15,063
SD Governor's Office of Economic Development$15,000
United Way of the Black Hills$12,750
Spearfish Trails Coalition$12,500
American Heart Association Inc$12,250
South Dakota Ellsworth Development Authority$10,000
University Of South Dakota$9,250
Beef Logic Inc$9,000
Helpline Center Inc$8,000
SDAHO Organizations$7,500
City of Box Elder$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wellspring Inc DBA Wellfully: $52k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 13 repeat orgs$825k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$2.2M
$646k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

69%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    ELEVATE RAPID CITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $479k · revenue +333%
  • LS
    LEADERSHIP SOUTH DAKOTA
    3× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +12%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue 0%
  • WI
    WELLSPRING INC
    one grant, 2024 · $52k · revenue -19%
  • TM
    TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Dakota Biotechnology Association

A south dakota alliance dedicated to the development of biotechnology industries through expansion of bio-based research, investment, education, advocacy, funding, education, infrastructure development, and promotion.

Community Improvement
2
South Dakota Retailers Association

Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.

—
3
Black Hills Works Inc

Creating a community where everyone participates to achieve a life of full potential.

Employment
4
South Dakota Rural Electric Association

To serve the rural electric cooperatives in south dakota, to promote the effective development of rural electrification in south dakota on a cooperative, non-profit basis.

—
5
South Dakota Agriculture and Rural Leadership Foundation

To identify and develop leadership for agriculture and rural communities to enhance the quality of life for all south dakotans.

Public Benefit
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
7
Credit Union Association of the Dakotas

The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.

—
8
Dakota State University Foundation

Dakota state university foundation is an independent non-profit corporation established for the purpose of raising and managing private funding for the benefit of dakota state university.

Education
9
University of South Dakota Foundation

To provide private resources for the university of south dakota to increase the excellence of its students' educational experience.

Education
10
Research Park At Sdsu

The sdsu growth partnership, ltd is dedicated to serve the brookings area, the state of south dakota and adjacent communities and states. to accomplish this goal, a long-term development strategy has been incorporated that will, over…

Education
11
Sioux Falls Development Foundation Inc

To collaboratively create quality economic growth and workforce development in sioux falls.

—
12
Downtown Sioux Falls

Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Hills Works Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Historic Rapid City. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
9/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pennington County Treasurer: $1,195,000 · OtherPennington County TreasurerELEVATE RAPID CITY: $478,500 · OtherELEVATE RAPID CITYSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $112,750 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY+14 more: $192,973 · Other+14 moreSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSIT…MITCHELL TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationMITCHELL TECHNICAL COLLEGE F…LEADERSHIP SOUTH DAKOTA: $60,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP SOUTH DAKOTACENTRAL STATES FAIR: $29,250 · EducationBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $27,563 · Education+1 more: $12,409 · EducationHistoric Rapid City: $150,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK HILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS: $24,000 · PhilanthropySOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWELLSPRING INC: $52,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $42,250 · HealthBlack Hills Trails: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsSUNCATCHER THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,979,223Education$769,222Arts & Culture$150,000Philanthropy$74,000Human Services$52,000Health$42,250Recreation & Sports$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetELEVATE RAPID CITY: $478,500 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetMITCHELL TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetLEADERSHIP SOUTH DAKOTA: $60,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetWELLSPRING INC: $52,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $42,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK HILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYELLOW JACKET FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL STATES FAIR: $29,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $27,563 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS: $24,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHELPLINE CENTER INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN INDIAN RESEARCH & NATIVE STUDIES: $12,409 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEEF LOGIC INC: $9,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA: $8,292 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSHRINERS INTERNATIONAL: $6,150 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSUNCATCHER THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of the Black Hills: $5,280 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLACK HILLS WORKS FOUNDATION INC: $5,001 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Black Hills Area Comm…Sanford Group ReturnSouth Dakota Communit…First Interstate Banc…Sioux Falls Area Comm…John T Vucurevich Fou…Clarkson Family Found…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Black Hills Area Community FoundationSD28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Black Hills Area Community Foundation · Sanford Group Return · South Dakota Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · John T Vucurevich Foundation · Clarkson Family Foundation Pioneer Bank & Trust Trustee · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monument Health Rapid City Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home