Skip to content

Montana · Public charity

Montana Wilderness Association

Uniting and mobilizing communities to keep montana wild.

$20k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$9k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$9,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$9,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$5.7M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations Montana Wilderness Association funded were first-time grantees, receiving 90% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$9k100%
FY20234$62k75%
FY20221$9k0%
FY20212$24k100%
FY20204$60k0%
FY20195$44k20%
FY20186$76k83%
FY20172$38kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$284kCivil Rights$28kRecreation & Sports$5kHealth$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Wilderness Society$48,62630%
The Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance$45,626314%
National Parks Conservation Association$45,62630%
Friends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc$40,00047%
Wild Montana Action Fund$33,900316%
Upper Seven Law$28,00013%
Montana Wildlife Federation$21,52215%
Headwaters Economics Inc$16,50011%
Ruby Valley Conservation District$11,3001n/a
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers$9,0001n/a
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Montana Wilderness Association by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Wilderness Society$48,62630%
The Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance$45,626314%
National Parks Conservation Association$45,62630%
Friends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc$40,00047%
Wild Montana Action Fund$33,900316%
Upper Seven Law$28,00013%
Montana Wildlife Federation$21,52215%
Headwaters Economics Inc$16,50011%
Ruby Valley Conservation District$11,3001n/a
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers$9,0001n/a
Yellowstone to Yukon$7,0001n/a
The Kendeda Fund$5,00010%
Montana Ambassadors Inc$5,0001n/a
Department of Public Health & Human Services$5,0001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Montana Wilderness Association supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Wilderness Society: $48,626 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance: $45,626 over 3y, 14% of budgetNational Parks Conservation Association: $45,626 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetWild Montana Action Fund: $33,900 over 3y, 16% of budgetUpper Seven Law: $28,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMontana Wildlife Federation: $21,522 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHeadwaters Economics Inc: $16,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Kendeda Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kendeda FundDE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kendeda Fund · Patagoniaorg · Wilburforce Foundation · Maki Foundation · Western Conservation Action · The High Stakes Foundation · Western Conservation Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Montana Wilderness Association with peer funders

About Montana Wilderness Association

How much does Montana Wilderness Association give?
Montana Wilderness Association reported 1 itemized grants totaling $9,000, out of $19,788 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Montana Wilderness Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (88%), Civil Rights (9%), Recreation & Sports (2%).
Who are Montana Wilderness Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Wilderness Society ($49k), The Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance ($46k), National Parks Conservation Association ($46k).
Does Montana Wilderness Association fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Montana Wilderness Association?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Kendeda Fund, Patagoniaorg, Wilburforce Foundation.
Where is Montana Wilderness Association based?
Montana Wilderness Association is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Montana Wilderness Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph