· Public charity
Montana History Foundation
Provide development and advisory leadership for organizations dedicated to the preservation of montana's history and culture.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $86,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $91,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF SHELBY | $10,000 |
| HERITAGE & CULTURAL FOUNDATION OF GARFIELD COUNTY | $10,000 |
| WOLF POINT AREA MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| TREASURE COUNTY 89ER'S MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| CONRAD PUBLIC LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| NINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA | $10,000 |
| CARTER COUNTY GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| GEORGE MCCONE COUNTY LIBRARY | $9,000 |
| POWDER RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCARTER COUNTY GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY4× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue +439%
- NMNINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA4× · 2021–2025 · $32k · revenue +62%
- FBFORT BENTON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION3× · 2019–2024 · $31k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +3%
- TCTHE CITY-COUNTY OF BUTTE-SILVER BOW MTone grant, 2024 · $16k
- RCReese Creek Community Centerone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Museum
To establish and operate the blaine county wildlife museum with the intent to provide quality wildlife museum exhibiting montana wildlife in their natural habitats, complete with audio and visual enhancement.
Developed by, for, and in conjunction with the community, the cashmere museum and pioneer village seeks to engage, educate, and entertain visitors both local and international. hundreds of volunteers have worked thousands of hours to make…
To preserve, interpret, and display local and natural history for education purposes.
The purposeof the museum of the plains is to preserve significant objects of the past. the museum fo the plains is an encyclopedic history museum established to bring about a better understanding and appreciation by the community and…
Preserving the past via a local museum.
To record and preserve the history and artifacts of Stillwater County and the vicinity. To build, maintain and operate a local museum to house and display a collection of such artifacts and memorabilia deemed to be unique to our area and…
To preserve, display & interpret local history.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Heritage Center and the most unlike its peers is Evelyn Cameron Heritage Inc Evelyn Cameron Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARTER COUNTY GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NINEPIPES MUSEUM OF EARLY MONTANA ↗
- Who funds FORT BENTON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EXTREME HISTORY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COUNTY 89 ERS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOULA ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Buses Of Yellowstone Preservation Trust Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THE MONTANA DINOSAUR CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASCADE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN HERITAGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OLD TRAIL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MONTANA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Reese Creek Community Center ↗
- Who funds Butte Citizens for Preservation and Revitalization ↗
- Who funds MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF STATE GRAZING DISTRICTS ↗
- Who funds MILES CITY CONVENT KEEPERS ↗
- Who funds MAI WAH SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WINNETT ACES INC ↗
- Who funds RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds The Paradise Center ↗
- Who funds MISSION VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds BIGFORK ART AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds HELENA TELEVISION COALITION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · Treacy Foundation · Humanities Montana · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Greater Montana Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Zeller-Knowles Foundation Inc · Speyer Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Montana History Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.