Skip to content
Montana Health Plus at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Montana Health Plus

Improve population health, provide a formal statewide system of care, increase optimal clinic outcomes and decrease overall healthcare costs for people in montana regardless of income or coverage status, by providing integrated, high quality, patient-centered care in a network of community-based health centers to the citizens of montana…

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$100,848
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE HEALTH$252,394
PARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER$216,139
BUTTE SILVER BOW PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC$207,122
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$164,070
FLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$145,509
RIVERSTONE HEALTH$118,654
ALLUVION HEALTH$100,848
PUREVIEW HEALTH CENTER$98,375
SAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC$63,034
BULLHOOK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$51,498
GLACIER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$38,981
MARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC$16,816
MONTANA MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER COUNCIL INC$5,869
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PUREVIEW HEALTH CENTER: $98k → 9%PARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER: $216k → 9%RIVERSTONE HEALTH: $119k → 9%FLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $146k → 11%SAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $63k → 11%ALLUVION HEALTH: $101k → 14%BUTTE SILVER BOW PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC: $207k → 16%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $164k → 17%MARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC: $17k → 18%BULLHOOK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $51k → 18%ONE HEALTH: $252k → 23%GLACIER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $39k → 26%MONTANA MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER COUNCIL INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sterling Area Health Center

Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.

Health
2
Mountain Valleys Health Centers

We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.

—
3
Black Canyon Community Health Center Inc

Provide medical services to all persons in need in a rural community more than 50 miles from any other service.

Health
4
Mountainlands Community Health Center

To provide medical, mental health, dental care, and affordable medicine to the medically underserved population.

Health
5
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
6
Girdwood Health Clinic Inc

Our mission is to build healthier communities by providing high-quality primary care that integrates physical and behavioral health while removing barriers to wellness.

Health
7
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
8
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
9
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
10
Sweet Medical Center

Empowering people to live healthy lives.

—
11
Montana Hospital Association

Montana hospital association is the principal advocate for the interests of members in their efforts to improve the health status of the communities they serve.

—
12
Community Health Systems Inc

Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Montana Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC: $252,394 · HealthBIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INCButte Silver Bow Primary Health Care Clinic Inc: $207,122 · HealthButte Silver Bow Primary Health Care Clinic IncLINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $164,070 · HealthLINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERFLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $145,509 · HealthFLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $100,848 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INCPUREVIEW HEALTH CENTER: $98,375 · HealthPUREVIEW HEALTH CENTERSAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $63,034 · HealthSAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INCBULLHOOK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $51,498 · HealthGLACIER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $38,981 · HealthPARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER INC: $216,139 · OtherPARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER …YELLOWSTONE CITY-COUNTY HEALTH: $118,654 · OtherYELLOWSTONE CITY-COUNTY HE…MARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC: $16,816 · OtherMONTANA MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER COUNCIL INC: $5,869 · Philanthropy
Health$1,121,831Other$351,609Philanthropy$5,869

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC: $252,394 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER INC: $216,139 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetButte Silver Bow Primary Health Care Clinic Inc: $207,122 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $164,070 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $145,509 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $100,848 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPUREVIEW HEALTH CENTER: $98,375 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $63,034 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBULLHOOK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $51,498 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGLACIER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $38,981 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC: $16,816 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER COUNCIL INC: $5,869 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montana Healthcare Fo…Delta Dental Communit…Direct Relief
Montana Healthcare FoundationMT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Healthcare Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Direct Relief

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Montana Health Plus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Montana Health Plus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Montana Health Plus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home