· Public charity
Montana Health Plus
Improve population health, provide a formal statewide system of care, increase optimal clinic outcomes and decrease overall healthcare costs for people in montana regardless of income or coverage status, by providing integrated, high quality, patient-centered care in a network of community-based health centers to the citizens of montana…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $252k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ONE HEALTH | $252,394 |
| PARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER | $216,139 |
| BUTTE SILVER BOW PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC | $207,122 |
| NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $164,070 |
| FLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC | $145,509 |
| RIVERSTONE HEALTH | $118,654 |
| ALLUVION HEALTH | $100,848 |
| PUREVIEW HEALTH CENTER | $98,375 |
| SAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC | $63,034 |
| BULLHOOK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $51,498 |
| GLACIER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $38,981 |
| MARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC | $16,816 |
| MONTANA MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER COUNCIL INC | $5,869 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.
We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.
Provide medical services to all persons in need in a rural community more than 50 miles from any other service.
To provide medical, mental health, dental care, and affordable medicine to the medically underserved population.
Our mission is to build healthier communities by providing high-quality primary care that integrates physical and behavioral health while removing barriers to wellness.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.
Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.
Empowering people to live healthy lives.
Montana hospital association is the principal advocate for the interests of members in their efforts to improve the health status of the communities they serve.
Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Montana Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Butte Silver Bow Primary Health Care Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PUREVIEW HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAPPHIRE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BULLHOOK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GLACIER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Montana Healthcare Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Direct Relief
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Montana Health Plus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.