Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monroe-Brown Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$5.2MPhilanthropy$3.1MEducation$1.1MScience & Tech$400kCommunity Improvement$319kArts & Culture$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $428k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.8M
$72,667
Median grant
4
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
DAFGIVING360$500,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE$500,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$250,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN$145,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$100,000
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$72,667
Individual grant recipient$60,000
KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION$50,000
BU FOUNDATION$35,189
THE LEELANAU SCHOOL$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$25,000
KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $50k → 12%KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $25k → 12%KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $25k → 12%KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $25k → 12%KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Monroe-Brown Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Monroe-Brown Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 17 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$7.6M
$534k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-18%

Still filing today

35%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $725k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +139%
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $465k · revenue +135%
  • KC
    KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S
    5× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • WH
    WMU HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE - DONOR ADVISED
    one grant, 2020 · $210k
  • TC
    THE CROSSING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -33%
  • AC
    ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
3
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
6
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
7
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
8
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
9
4FRONT Credit Union

To provide financial services to members with a common bond.

—
10
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
11
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
12
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalamazoo Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Specialized Language Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $4,909,088 · OtherUniversity of MichiganUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - DONOR ADVISED: $800,783 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - DONOR ADVISEDKALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - DONOR ADVISED: $531,000 · OtherKALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - DONOR ADVISEDVANGUARD CHARITABLE: $500,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLEVANGUARD CHARITABLE - DONOR ADVISED: $423,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE - DONOR ADVISED+19 more: $608,596 · Other+19 moreKALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyKALAMAZOO COMMUNI…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHA…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDAT…UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $145,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOU…WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $465,001 · EducationTHE CROSSING INC: $75,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $31,000 · EducationThe Leelanau School: $25,000 · Education+2 more: $12,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION: $150,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST CORP: $10,950 · Community Improvement+1 more: $100 · Community ImprovementKALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $127,500 · Human ServicesARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $60,000 · Arts & CultureKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSPECIALIZED LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $20,000 · Health
Other$7,772,467Philanthropy$1,645,000Education$608,001Community Improvement$161,050Human Services$127,500Arts & Culture$75,000Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $465,001 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION: $150,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $145,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S: $127,500 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTHE CROSSING INC: $75,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $60,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Leelanau School: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPECIALIZED LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST CORP: $10,950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION BORGESS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSSING INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF GREATER KALAMAZOO ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Leelanau School ↗
  • Who funds SPECIALIZED LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST CORP ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION BORGESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kalamazoo Community FoundationMI30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · H P & Genevieve Connable Fund · Preston S and Barbara J Parish Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monroe-Brown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monroe-Brown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monroe-Brown’s filings →

    More from the funding graph