Skip to content
Monomoy Fund Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Monomoy Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$129k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$299kAnimals$167kRecreation & Sports$133kInternational$87kArts & Culture$80kReligion$53kHealth$27kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY$10,000
GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION$10,000
BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY ENV MGMT CNTR$10,000
NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY$10,000
GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH$7,500
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$7,500
BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER$5,000
STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
OAHA$5,000
WINDY HILL FOUNDATION$3,500
CARDINAL LAND CONSERVANCY$2,500
ARC OF APPALACHIA$2,500
RAINFOREST TRUST$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $5k → 6%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 17%FAUNA AND FLORA INTERNATIONAL: $55k → 14%BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER: $5k → 7%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 6%SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $5k → 6%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%FAUNA AND FLORA INTERNATIONAL: $55k → 14%BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER: $10k → 7%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 6%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS MEDICINES SANS FRONTIERS: $10k → 17%FAUNA AND FLORA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 14%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 6%FAUNA AND FLORA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 14%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 6%FAUNA AND FLORA INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $15k → 6%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 6%FAUNA AND FLORA INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $15k → 6%GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY ENV MGMT CNTR: $10k → 6%GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 6%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 6%GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $8k → 6%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 6%AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY: $6k → 6%GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
NE
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$825k · 36 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
9

Total granted

$825k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+46%

Still filing today

78%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $170k · revenue +654%
  • AB
    American Bird Conservancy
    7× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +54%
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • DW
    DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS MEDICINES SANS FRONTIERS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • OA
    Oxford Area Historical Association
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -18%
  • AP
    AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +162%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
5
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
6
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
7
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
8
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
9
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
10
International Center for the Preservation of Wild Animals Inc

The wilds is a conservation center and safari park operating as a not-for-profit 501(c)3 organization on nearly 10,000-acres in southeastern ohio. the wilds specializes in high-quality recreational opportunities that focus on connecting…

Animals
11
Natural Resources Foundation of

To protect wisconsin's lands, waters, and wildlife by providing funding, leading partnerships, and connecting all people with nature.

—
12
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Primate Protection League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
31/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $67,500 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $52,500 · OtherGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $15,500 · OtherWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $14,500 · OtherSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · OtherBRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY ENV MGMT CNTR: $10,000 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS MEDICINES SANS FRONTIERS: $10,000 · OtherRAINFOREST TRUST: $15,500 · OtherSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $24,500 · OtherSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTERAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $11,000 · Other+25 more: $67,500 · Other+25 moreFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $170,000 · PhilanthropyFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONA…BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER: $45,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTERGREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 · EnvironmentGREAT MEADOW F…THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN C…THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $9,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT E…AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentISLAND PRESS: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $4,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,000 · Environment+6 more: $10,250 · Environment+6 moreAmerican Bird Conservancy: $80,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bir…INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $7,250 · AnimalsINTERNATIONA…MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Animals+5 more: $10,500 · Animals+5 moreTHE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $70,000 · EducationTHE NATIO…SANFORD SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationSANFORD S…Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art: $54,500 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureOxford Area Historical Association: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 · Health
Other$298,500Philanthropy$215,000Environment$119,250Animals$101,750Education$77,500Arts & Culture$65,500Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $170,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $70,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBrandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art: $54,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER: $45,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $24,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSANFORD SCHOOL: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $7,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWHYY INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOxford Area Historical Association: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND PRESS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOC BEAGLES INC: $4,250 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetARC OF APPALACHIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSustainable Harvest International: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLeague for Animal Welfare: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARDINAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI RECYCLING AND REUSE HUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIEDMONT JOURNALISM FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING GROVE CEMETERY AND ARBORETUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreenacres Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds Oxford Area Historical Association ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND PRESS ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MOC BEAGLES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Luminescence Foun…Dun FoundationWilliam M Backer Foun…McGraw FoundationThe Van Metre Family …The Greater Cincinnat…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Awa Family FoundationWise FoundationFrederick Henry Princ…Johnson Charitable Gi…Ronald M Bradley Foun…
The Luminescence Foundation IncVA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Luminescence Foundation Inc · Dun Foundation · William M Backer Foundation Inc · McGraw Foundation · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Awa Family Foundation · Wise Foundation · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ronald M Bradley Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monomoy Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monomoy Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sea Education Association Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Sanford School: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Monomoy Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Monomoy Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Monomoy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home