Loading…
· Public charity
MONMOUTH PARK CHARITY FUND INC
Raising of funds for distribution to monmouth county nj charities
$194k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants
1
Communities
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0164% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2022.
Recreation & Sports$22kHuman Services$19kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$34k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
covid emergencyemergency relief
2021
—
2022
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$18,725
Median grant
1
States reached
$339k
Total assets
Largest grants
- MERCY CENTER$18,725
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Mental Health Association
To support the goals and programs of the mental health association of monmouth county, inc.
Health
2
Mental Health Center of Passaic Inc
The organization is a freestanding outpatient mental health facility that provides mental health services
—
3
Irvington Counseling Center Inc
Mental health counseling
—
4
Monmouth Area Chamber of Commerce
Chamber of commerce
—
5
The Arc of Hunterdon County
The arc of hunterdon county supports and empowers individuals experiencing intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families. the agency enables those it supports to live and work in the community on their own terms as proud,…
—
6
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
—
7
Meals on Wheels of Mercer County Inc
To assist participants in Mercer County, NJ in maintaining independence, dignity, health & well-being by providing comprehensive nutrician services and helping ease social isolation.
—
8
Montco Anti-Hunger Network
Montco anti-hunger network works to end hunger, through innovation, emergency food provider support, best practices, policy advocacy and providing food resources.
Food & Nutrition
9
Child Care Resources of Monmouth County
Promote affordable and developmentally sound child care services in monmouth county.
Human Services
10
Harbor Community Clinic Inc
To provide quality, comprehensive, healthcare and supportive services to those in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.
Health
11
Mental Health Connecticut Inc
Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.
Health
12
The Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean
To alleviate hunger and build food security in monmouth and ocean counties, new jersey.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association of Monmouth and the most unlike its peers is Handicapped High Riders Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$33,750Recreation & Sports$21,500Human Services$18,725Health$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
New Jersey Natural Gas Company CharityNJ20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity · Oceanfirst Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Manasquan Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · The Stone Foundation of New Jersey · Td Charitable Foundation · The Amboy Foundation · The Jay and Linda Grunin Foundation · Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates · The Provident Bank Foundation · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MONMOUTH PARK CHARITY FUND INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Habcore Inc — 50% of income from government
- Interfaith Neighbors Inc — 9% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOCIAL JUSTICE AT TRINITY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 222286026 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOCIAL JUSTICE AT TRINITY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Monmouth Park Charity Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Monmouth Park Charity Fund Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines