Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mollys Angels

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$260kCrime & Legal$122kHealth$113kRecreation & Sports$51kYouth Development$49kAnimals$23kHuman Services$15kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $171k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONARCH SCHOOL$107,785
VISTA HILL FOUNDATION$63,063
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$23,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION$20,000
BOYS TO MEN MENTORING$15,000
JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH$6,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO$5,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$589k · 7 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$589k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+53%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $260k · revenue +38%
  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $122k · revenue +0%
  • VH
    VISTA HILL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $98k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +53%
  • FP
    FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
2
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc

CASA recruits, trains, and supports community volunteers who advocate for chidren and youth throughout their journey in foster care.

Crime & Legal
4
San Diego Center for Children

Founded in 1887, the center is the oldest children's nonprofit in the region accredited by the joint commission for its excellence in quality of care. the center provides a continuum of therapeutic & educational services to youth &…

Human Services
5
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
6
Social Advocates for Youth San Diego Inc

To partner with youth, families, adults and communities to reach their full potential and is achieved through comprehensive and integrated programming in the areas of child and youth development; youth, adult and family wellness and…

Human Services
7
Marin Court Appointed Special Advocates

Marin casa provides a voice for abused, neglected and abandoned youth in the marin county juvenile court system. our goal is to see every youth thrive in a safe, permanent and supportive home. as sworn officers of the court, our volunteer…

Crime & Legal
8
Childrens Legal Services of San Diego

The purpose of providing legal representation and advocacy to foster children and youth in the San Diego County courts.

Philanthropy
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Child Advocates of Contra Costa County

The court appointed special advocates (casa) program recruits, trains, and supports volunteer advocates to support abused and neglected children during the court process, to help every child find a permanent home and complete their…

Civil Rights
11
Hannahs Family Center

Hannahs Family Center envisions a world where strong families enable children to thrive and communities to prosper. Since 1993, we have helped San Diego families navigate significant adverse changes, trauma and loss. As experts in…

Education
12
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of San Diego; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Humane Society and Spca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $259,535 · EducationMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECTVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $121,998 · Civil RightsVOICES FOR CHILDRENVISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $97,843 · HealthVISTA HILL FOUNDA…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $51,150 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN …FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING …Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $23,000 · AnimalsCITY OF HOPE: $15,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 · Human Services
Education$259,535Civil Rights$121,998Health$97,843Philanthropy$56,150Youth Development$48,500Animals$23,000Other$15,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $259,535 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $121,998 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $97,843 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $51,150 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetBoys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $27,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $23,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mollys Angels funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mollys Angels. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mollys Angels?

    Find your warmest path to Mollys Angels through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mollys Angels’ filings →

    More from the funding graph