Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$211kEducation$197kEnvironment$84kFood & Nutrition$75kPhilanthropy$49kRecreation & Sports$34kHealth$25kArts & Culture$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $47k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$12,500
EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH$12,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$12,000
HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
MOUNTAIN AREA LAND TRUST$8,500
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$6,000
ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO$6,000
MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE & HOSPICE$6,000
BOOTSTRAPS SCHOLARSHIPS & LOANS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$4,000
DENVER POST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - SEASON TO SHARE$3,000
KANSAS COSMOSPHERE & SPACE CENTER INC$2,500
PALMER LAND CONSERVANCY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
SD
CA
CO
NE
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$608k · 31 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
12

Total granted

$608k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+98%

Still filing today

65%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +74%
  • EC
    EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +110%
  • HP
    HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +578%
  • TU
    TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • MS
    MEAN STREET MINISTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +124%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
4
Colorado Headwaters Land Trust

To conserve and steward the open lands and natural character of the headwaters of the colorado river in partnership with the local community.

—
5
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
8
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
9
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
10
Mile High United Way Curtis Park

Construct, finance, and own the mile high united way morgridge center for community change.

—
11
Estes Valley Land Trust

The mission of estes valley land trust is to conserve land throughout the estes valley and surrounding areas for current and future generations.

Environment
12
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Area Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
26/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $110,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONBootstraps Inc: $34,500 · OtherBootstraps IncIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDENVER POST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - SEASON TO SHARE: $12,000 · Other+26 more: $117,250 · Other+26 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $48,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TR…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $29,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF C…HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEG…SUMMER SCHOLARS: $8,000 · EducationSUMMER SCHOLARSFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationFORT HAYS STATE…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK O…EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $58,750 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN …DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RES…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $34,000 · Recreation & SportsWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsMOUNTAIN AREA LAND TRUST: $44,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $5,000 · EnvironmentHUTCHINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $43,500 · PhilanthropyMEAN STREET MINISTRY: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$334,750Education$100,000Food & Nutrition$75,000Human Services$69,750Recreation & Sports$57,500Environment$49,000Philanthropy$48,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $58,750 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $48,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN AREA LAND TRUST: $44,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHUTCHINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $43,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetBootstraps Inc: $34,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $29,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN LIVING COMMUNITIES: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DBA MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE AND HOS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 81% of budgetSUMMER SCHOLARS: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHLAND RESCUE TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEAN STREET MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAR CREEK LAND CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN AREA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bootstraps Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LIVING COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DBA MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE AND HOS ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND RESCUE TEAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MEAN STREET MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAR CREEK LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO28.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Sweeneys Share The Love Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mollie Mitchell & John Wilson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph