Skip to content
Moffitt John Foundation-Main at a glance

· Private foundation

Moffitt John Foundation-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$476k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$673kEducation$438kHousing & Shelter$269kInternational$236k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $254k
$31,764
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS$63,480
SIGHTLIFE$63,480
LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO$63,480
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$63,480
OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME$42,336
WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES$42,336
WA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLIND$31,764
AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS$31,764
TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL$31,764
LONGVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT$26,478
UNICEF USA$5,286
THE PINEY WOODS SCHOOL$5,286
LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,286
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 10%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 17%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $33k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $44k → 8%TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL: $32k → 12%SIGHTLIFE: $66k → 9%WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES: $36k → 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $66k → 23%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 17%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $32k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $42k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $63k → 9%WOODLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT: $22k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $63k → 23%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 17%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $31k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $42k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $62k → 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $62k → 23%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $27k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $36k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $66k → 13%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $27k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $36k → 8%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $63k → 13%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $27k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $36k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $62k → 13%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $26k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $35k → 8%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $66k → 9%LONGVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT: $26k → 13%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $63k → 9%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $62k → 9%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%KALAMA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $26k → 13%TOUTLE LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $27k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 14 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$120k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SIGHTLIFE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $404k · revenue +7%
  • NK
    NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $404k · revenue +17%
  • WM
    WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $269k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TL
    TOUTLE LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $27k
  • KS
    KALAMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
  • CR
    CASTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Kidney Fund Inc

The mission of the american kidney fund is to fight kidney disease and help people live healthier lives. founded in 1971, akf fights kidney disease on all fronts with a comprehensive scope of programs that support people across the…

—
2
International Society of Nephrology

The international society of nephrology is a professional organization dedicated to advancing worldwide kidney health.

Health
3
National Kidney Foundation of Illinois

The national kidney foundation of illinois improves the health and well-being of people at risk for or affected by kidney disease through prevention, education, and empowerment.

—
4
National Kidney Foundation of Hawaii Inc

The mission of the national kidney foundation of hawai'i (nkfh) is to prevent kidney and urinary tract disease, improve the health and well-being of individuals and families affected by this disease, and increase the availability of all…

Health
5
Pkd Foundation

We give hope. we fund research, advocate for patients, and build a community for all impacted by pkd.

—
6
National Kidney Foundation of Florida Inc

The mission of the national kidney foundation of florida is to prevent kidney and urinary tract diseases, improve the health and well-being of patients and families affected by these diseases and increase the availability of all organs for…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
9
National Association of Nephrology Technologists (Nant)

The mission of the national association of nephrology technologists (nant) is to promote the highest quality of care for chronic kidney disease (ckd) patients through education and professionalism. nant's goals are to provide educational…

—
10
Dialysis Clinic Inc

The primary responsibility of dialysis clinic inc. (dci) is to provide comprehensive and specialized care to patients living with chronic kidney disease (ckd) and end stage renal disease (esrd).

Health
11
National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc

To prevent kidney disease and improve the quality of life for those living with it.

Health
12
The Kidney Cancer Association

The kidney cancer association is a global community dedicated to serving and empowering patients, and leading change through advocacy, research, and education in order to be the universal leader in finding the cure for kidney cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Kidney Foundation of Louisiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Piney Woods School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $403,773 · OtherLIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ COOREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $269,284 · OtherOREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOMETUCKER MAXON SCHOOL: $202,039 · OtherTUCKER MAXON SCHOOLWA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLIND: $202,039 · OtherWA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLINDNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC: $191,232 · OtherNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC+7 more: $202,039 · Other+7 moreNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $403,773 · HealthNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTER…National Kidney Foundation Inc: $212,541 · HealthNational Kidney Foundat…SIGHTLIFE: $403,773 · Community ImprovementSIGHTLIFEWASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES: $269,284 · Housing & ShelterWASHINGTON…AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $202,039 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $33,622 · InternationalPiney Woods School: $33,622 · Education
Other$1,470,406Health$616,314Community Improvement$403,773Housing & Shelter$269,284International$235,661Education$33,622

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIGHTLIFE: $403,773 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $403,773 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES: $269,284 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $212,541 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTUCKER MAXON SCHOOL: $202,039 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $202,039 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC: $191,232 over 3y, 13% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $33,622 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPiney Woods School: $33,622 over 7y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIGHTLIFE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Piney Woods School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moffitt John Foundation-Main funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moffitt John Foundation-Main. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moffitt John Foundation-Main’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home