Loading…
· Private foundation
MOFFITT JOHN FOUNDATION-MAIN
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$467k
Granted FY2024
13
Grants
6
Communities
$62k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of MOFFITT JOHN FOUNDATION-MAIN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 13 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $202k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $249k
$31,145
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SIGHTLIFE$62,242
- LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO$62,242
- NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$62,242
- NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS$62,242
- WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES$41,511
- OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME$41,511
- AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS$31,145
- WA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLIND$31,145
- TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL$31,145
- KALAMA SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,962
- THE PINEY WOODS SCHOOL$5,183
- UNICEF USA$5,183
- LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,183
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 57% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 13 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else
13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
13
6
Total granted
$2.4M
$169k
Still filing today
62%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterInternationalEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSIGHTLIFE6× · 2019–2024 · $340k · revenue +5%
- NKNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS6× · 2019–2024 · $340k · revenue +12%
- WMWASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES6× · 2019–2024 · $227k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- NKNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $53k
- TLTOUTLE LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2023 · $27k
- WSWOODLAND SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2020 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
National Kidney Foundation of Utah
The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…
Health
2
American Kidney Fund Inc
We help people fight kidney disease and live healthier lives.
—
3
National Association of Nephrology
The mission of the national association of nephrology technologists (nant) is to promote the highest quality of care for chronic kidney disease (ckd) patients through education and professionalism. nant's goals are to provide educational…
—
4
National Kidney Foundation of Florida
The mission of the national kidney foundation of florida is to prevent kidney and urinary tract diseases, improve the health and well-being of patients and families affected by these diseases and increase the availability of all organs for…
Health
5
Asn Foundation for Kidney Research
To prevent and cure kidney diseases through research and innovation.
Health
6
International Society of Nephrology
The international society of nephrology is a professional organization dedicated to advancing worldwide kidney health.
Health
7
National Kidney Foundation of
To prevent kidney disease and improve the quality of life for those living with it.
Health
8
Kidney Foundation of Central Pa
Dedicated to providing chronic kidney disease education and outreach, support services to people whose lives are impacted by kidney disease, and advocating for more living organ donations in order to reduce the wait for a life-saving…
Health
9
Kidney Foundation of Northwest Ohio
Provide care, education and research regarding the prevention and treatment of kidney disease.
Health
10
Tennessee Kidney Foundation Inc
To empower and support those at risk or affected by kidney disease. Its vision is a Tennessee where the rate of kidney disease is minimized and everyone who needs care receives care.
Philanthropy
11
National Kidney Foundation of Illinois
To provide public education, professional education, patient services, and research grants relating to kidney disease in illinois.
—
12
American Society of Nephrology
ASN leads the fight against kidney diseases by educating health professionals, sharing new knowledge, advancing research, and advocating the highest quality care for patients.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Kidney Centers and the most unlike its peers is National Kidney Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,287,474Health$499,514Community Improvement$340,293Housing & Shelter$226,948International$170,275Education$28,336
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MOFFITT JOHN FOUNDATION-MAIN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~10 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 720649707 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Moffitt John Foundation-Main?
Find your warmest path to Moffitt John Foundation-Main through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines