Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Moffitt John Foundation-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$476k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$673kEducation$438kHousing & Shelter$269kInternational$236k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $254k
$31,764
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS$63,480
SIGHTLIFE$63,480
LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO$63,480
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$63,480
WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES$42,336
OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME$42,336
AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS$31,764
WA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLIND$31,764
TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL$31,764
LONGVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT$26,478
UNICEF USA$5,286
THE PINEY WOODS SCHOOL$5,286
LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,286
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 10%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 17%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $33k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $44k → 8%TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL: $32k → 12%SIGHTLIFE: $66k → 9%WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES: $36k → 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $66k → 23%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 17%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $32k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $42k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $63k → 9%WOODLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT: $22k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $63k → 23%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $53k → 17%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $31k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $42k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $62k → 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $62k → 23%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $27k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $36k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $66k → 13%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $27k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $36k → 8%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $63k → 13%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $27k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $36k → 8%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $62k → 13%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $26k → 10%OREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $35k → 8%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%SIGHTLIFE: $53k → 9%LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO: $53k → 13%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $66k → 9%LONGVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT: $26k → 13%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $63k → 9%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $62k → 9%NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $53k → 9%KALAMA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $26k → 13%TOUTLE LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $27k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 14 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$120k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SIGHTLIFE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $404k · revenue +7%
  • NK
    NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $404k · revenue +17%
  • WM
    WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $269k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TL
    TOUTLE LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $27k
  • KS
    KALAMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
  • CR
    CASTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Kidney Fund Inc

The mission of the american kidney fund is to fight kidney disease and help people live healthier lives. founded in 1971, akf fights kidney disease on all fronts with a comprehensive scope of programs that support people across the…

2
International Society of Nephrology

The international society of nephrology is a professional organization dedicated to advancing worldwide kidney health.

Health
3
National Kidney Foundation of Illinois

The national kidney foundation of illinois improves the health and well-being of people at risk for or affected by kidney disease through prevention, education, and empowerment.

4
National Kidney Foundation of Hawaii Inc

The mission of the national kidney foundation of hawai'i (nkfh) is to prevent kidney and urinary tract disease, improve the health and well-being of individuals and families affected by this disease, and increase the availability of all…

Health
5
Pkd Foundation

We give hope. we fund research, advocate for patients, and build a community for all impacted by pkd.

6
National Kidney Foundation of Florida Inc

The mission of the national kidney foundation of florida is to prevent kidney and urinary tract diseases, improve the health and well-being of patients and families affected by these diseases and increase the availability of all organs for…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
9
National Association of Nephrology Technologists (Nant)

The mission of the national association of nephrology technologists (nant) is to promote the highest quality of care for chronic kidney disease (ckd) patients through education and professionalism. nant's goals are to provide educational…

10
Dialysis Clinic Inc

The primary responsibility of dialysis clinic inc. (dci) is to provide comprehensive and specialized care to patients living with chronic kidney disease (ckd) and end stage renal disease (esrd).

Health
11
National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc

To prevent kidney disease and improve the quality of life for those living with it.

Health
12
The Kidney Cancer Association

The kidney cancer association is a global community dedicated to serving and empowering patients, and leading change through advocacy, research, and education in order to be the universal leader in finding the cure for kidney cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Kidney Foundation of Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Piney Woods School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ CO — $403,773 · OtherLIFE WORKS DBA THE ARC OF COWLITZ COOREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME — $269,284 · OtherOREGON MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOMETUCKER MAXON SCHOOL — $202,039 · OtherTUCKER MAXON SCHOOLWA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLIND — $202,039 · OtherWA STATE DEPT SVCS FOR THE BLINDNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC — $191,232 · OtherNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC+7 more — $202,039 · Other+7 moreNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS — $403,773 · HealthNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTER…National Kidney Foundation Inc — $212,541 · HealthNational Kidney Foundat…SIGHTLIFE — $403,773 · Community ImprovementSIGHTLIFEWASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES — $269,284 · Housing & ShelterWASHINGTON…AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC — $202,039 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $33,622 · InternationalPiney Woods School — $33,622 · Education
Other$1,470,406Health$616,314Community Improvement$403,773Housing & Shelter$269,284International$235,661Education$33,622

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIGHTLIFE — $403,773 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS — $403,773 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES — $269,284 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $212,541 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTUCKER MAXON SCHOOL — $202,039 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC — $202,039 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC — $191,232 over 3y, 13% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $33,622 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPiney Woods School — $33,622 over 7y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIGHTLIFE
  • Who funds NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS
  • Who funds WASHINGTON MASONIC CHARITIES
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc
  • Who funds TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds Piney Woods School

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moffitt John Foundation-Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph